III.  That, for the better elucidation of his policy in the several articles of the treaty above mentioned, the said Hastings did send to the Council of Calcutta (now consisting of Edward Wheler and John Macpherson, Esquires) two different copies of the said treaty, with explanatory minutes opposed to each article; and that the minute opposed to the third article is thus expressed.

“The conduct of Fyzoola Khan, in refusing the aid demanded, though (1.) not an absolute breach of treaty, was evasive and uncandid. (2.) The demand was made for five thousand cavalry. (3.) The engagement, in the treaty is literally for five thousand horse and foot.  Fyzoola Khan could not be ignorant that we had no occasion for any succors of infantry from him, and that cavalry would be of the most essential service. (4.) So scrupulous an attention to literal expression, when a more liberal interpretation would have been highly useful and acceptable to us, strongly marks his unfriendly disposition, though it may not impeach his fidelity, and leaves him little claim to any exertions from us for the continuance of his jaghires.  But (5.) I am of opinion that neither the Vizier’s nor the Company’s interests would be promoted by depriving Fyzoola Khan of his independency, and I have (6.) therefore reserved the execution of this agreement to an indefinite term; and our government may always interpose to prevent any ill effects from it.”

IV.  That, in his aforesaid authentic evidence of his own purposes, motives, and principles, in the third article of the treaty of Chunar, the said Hastings hath established divers matters of weighty and serious crimination against himself.

1st.  That the said Hastings doth acknowledge therein, that he did, in a public instrument, solemnly recognize, “as a breach of treaty,” and as such did subject to the consequent penalties, an act which he, the said Hastings, did at the same time think, and did immediately declare, to be “no breach of treaty”; and by so falsely and unjustly proceeding against a person under the Company’s guaranty, the said Hastings, on his own confession, did himself break the faith of the said guaranty.

2d.  That, in justifying this breach of the Company’s faith, the said Hastings doth wholly abandon his second peremptory demand for the three thousand horse, and the protest consequent thereon; and the said Hastings doth thereby himself condemn the violence and injustice of the same.

3dly.  That, in recurring to the original demand of five thousand horse as the ground of his justification, the said Hastings doth falsely assert “the engagement in the treaty to be literally FIVE thousand horse and foot,” whereas it is in fact for TWO or THREE thousand men; and the said Hastings doth thereby wilfully attempt to deceive and mislead his employers, which is an high crime and misdemeanor in a servant of so great trust.