The first fifteen volumes of this great work, published between the years 1749 and 1767, treated of the theory of the earth, the nature of animals, and the history of man and viviparous quadrupeds; and was the joint work of Buffon and Daubenton, a physician of Buffon’s native village.  The scientific portion of the work was done by Daubenton, who possessed considerable anatomical knowledge, and who wrote accurate descriptions of the various animals mentioned.  Buffon, however, affected to ignore the work of his co-laborer and reaped the entire glory, so that Daubenton withdrew his services.  Later appeared the nine volumes on birds, in which Buffon was aided by the Abbe Sexon.  Then followed the ‘History of Minerals’ in five volumes, and seven volumes of ‘Supplements,’ the last one of which was published the year after Buffon’s death.

One can hardly admire the personal character of Buffon.  He was vain and superficial, and given to extravagant speculations.  He is reported to have said, “I know but five great geniuses—­Newton, Bacon, Leibnitz, Montesquieu, and myself.”  His natural vanity was undoubtedly fostered by the adulation which he received from those in authority.  He saw his own statue placed in the cabinet of Louis XVI., with the inscription “Majestati Naturae par ingenium.”  Louis XV. bestowed upon him a title of nobility, and crowned heads “addressed him in language of the most exaggerated compliment.”  Buffon’s conduct and conversation were marked throughout by a certain coarseness and vulgarity that constantly appear in his writings.  He was foppish and trifling, and affected religion though at heart a disbeliever.

The chief value of Buffon’s work lies in the fact that it first brought the subject of natural history into popular literature.  Probably no writer of the time, with the exception of Voltaire and Rousseau, was so widely read and quoted as Buffon.  But the gross inaccuracy which pervaded his writings, and the visionary theories in which he constantly indulged, gave the work a less permanent value than it might otherwise have attained.  Buffon detested the scientific method, preferring literary finish to accuracy of statement.  Although the work was widely translated, and was the only popular natural history of the time, there is little of it that is worthy of a place in the world’s best literature.  It is chiefly as a relic of a past literary epoch, and as the pioneer work in a new literary field, that Buffon’s writings appeal to us.  They awakened for the first time a wide interest in natural history, though their author was distinctly not a naturalist.

Arabella Buckley has said of Buffon and his writings that though “he often made great mistakes and arrived at false conclusions, still he had so much genius and knowledge that a great part of his work will always remain true.”  Cuvier has left us a good memoir of Buffon in the ‘Biographic Universelle.’

[Illustration:  Signature:  Spencer Trotter]