=======================================================

=========
| Per Cent   |        |  For     | Against  |                  |
| Illiteracy | County | Suffrage | Suffrage |                  |
| Voting Age |        | Amendment| Amendment|                  |
|   Males    |        |          |          |                  |
|------------+--------+----------+----------+---------------

---|
|    26.2    |Lincoln |    466   |  3,213   |7 to 1 against    |
|    26.4    |Boone   |    678   |  1,828   |3 lacking 6 votes |
|            |        |          |          |   to 1 against   |
|    27.7    |Logan   |    856   |  2,774   |3-1/4 to 1 against|
|    28.2    |Mingo   |    712   |  2,609   |3-2/3 to 1 against|
|    29.7    |McDowell|  1,436   |  4,832   |3-1/3 to 1 against|
============================================================

====

In the first group the negro vote is under 5 per cent. of the whole.  In the second this is also true of Boone and Lincoln counties.  The number of negro males of voting age is nearly 6 per cent. in Logan county, 11.2 per cent. in Mingo county and 34.1 per cent. in McDowell county.

It is a matter of interest to observe that the counties giving the largest majority against were Clay, 6 to 1; Grant, 7 to 1; Hardy, 7-2/3 to 1; Lincoln, 7 to 1; Raleigh, 5 to 1, and that in none of these is the negro male population of voting age in excess of 5 per cent.  White illiteracy is high, the lowest in this group being that found in Grant county, 13.3 per cent.

Had there been an honest election and a fair count in West Virginia, it is possible, even probable, that woman suffrage would have been defeated, but the fact remains that no human being can know that, since the amendment went down to defeat in an election that can only be described as “The Shame of West Virginia.”

In all three states the pending amendments were caught in the toils of the “wet and dry” issue.  The “wets” obsessed by the idea that woman suffrage is “next door to prohibition” used their entire machinery to defeat the amendments, while the “drys” regarded the amendments as distinctly separate questions.  These conditions may be regarded as the inevitable hazards of a campaign.  It is, however, not at all clear that the amendments were defeated in any one of the three states by the honest “will of the majority.”  In none of them were women permitted to serve as watchers over their amendment.  In Iowa well established proof of wilful or careless violations of laws throws doubt over the returns, while in West Virginia the suspicion of fraud rests upon the entire election.  In Iowa four and in South Dakota nine counties colonized by people of foreign birth or parentage deprived the women of the state of their vote.

A Federal amendment ratified by the legislatures of the several states would secure to the women of South Dakota and Iowa the rights for which American and Americanized men have voted.  The entire western or most American part of South Dakota has been twice carried for suffrage, that is, in 1914 and 1916.  One county, Harding, adjacent to Wyoming, has been carried for woman suffrage in the six referenda on the question, the first one being held in 1890.