Theoretically speaking, the Village Parliament has a Speaker, in the person of the Village Elder.  The word Speaker is etymologically less objectionable than the term President, for the personage in question never sits down, but mingles in the crowd like the ordinary members.  Objection may be taken to the word on the ground that the Elder speaks much less than many other members, but this may likewise be said of the Speaker of the House of Commons.  Whatever we may call him, the Elder is officially the principal personage in the crowd, and wears the insignia of office in the form of a small medal suspended from his neck by a thin brass chain.  His duties, however, are extremely light.  To call to order those who interrupt the discussion is no part of his functions.  If he calls an honourable member “Durak” (blockhead), or interrupts an orator with a laconic “Moltchi!” (hold your tongue!), he does so in virtue of no special prerogative, but simply in accordance with a time-honoured privilege, which is equally enjoyed by all present, and may be employed with impunity against himself.  Indeed, it may be said in general that the phraseology and the procedure are not subjected to any strict rules.  The Elder comes prominently forward only when it is necessary to take the sense of the meeting.  On such occasions he may stand back a little from the crowd and say, “Well, orthodox, have you decided so?” and the crowd will probably shout, “Ladno! ladno!” that is to say, “Agreed! agreed!”

Communal measures are generally carried in this way by acclamation; but it sometimes happens that there is such a diversity of opinion that it is difficult to tell which of the two parties has a majority.  In this case the Elder requests the one party to stand to the right and the other to the left.  The two groups are then counted, and the minority submits, for no one ever dreams of opposing openly the will of the Mir.

During the reign of Nicholas I. an attempt was made to regulate by the written law the procedure of Village Assemblies amongst the peasantry of the State Domains, and among other reforms voting by ballot was introduced; but the new custom never struck root.  The peasants did not regard with favour the new method, and persisted in calling it, contemptuously, “playing at marbles.”  Here, again, we have one of those wonderful and apparently anomalous facts which frequently meet the student of Russian affairs:  the Emperor Nicholas I., the incarnation of autocracy and the champion of the Reactionary Party throughout Europe, forces the ballot-box, the ingenious invention of extreme radicals, on several millions of his subjects!