Lacking the full report that Gomez presumably made of his voyage, and lacking the original of his chart, it is impossible to decide whether he did or did not pass through the Narrows and enter the Upper Bay.  Doctor Asher holds that he did make that passage; and adds:  “It is certain that the later Spanish seamen who followed in his track in after years were familiar with the [Hudson] river, and called it the Rio de Gamas.”  In support of this strong assertion he cites the still-extant “Rutters,” or “Routiers,” of the period—­the ocean guide-books showing the distances from place to place, marking convenient stations for watering and refitting, and describing the entrances to rivers and to harbors—­“from which we learn,” he declares, “that the Rio de Gamas, the name then regularly applied to the Hudson on the charts of the time, was one of these stages between New Foundland and the colonies of Central America."[1]

[Footnote 1:  Asher mentions, in this connection, that “Nantucket Island also figures in some of these rutters under the name of the island of Juan Luis, or Juan Fernandez, and is recommended as a most convenient stage for those who, coming from Europe, wish to proceed to the West Indies by way of the Bermudas.”]

In regard to Verrazano—­admitting his report to be genuine—­the fact that he did pass through the Narrows into the Upper Bay is not open to dispute.  He therefore must have seen—­as, a little later, Gomez may have seen—­the true mouth of Hudson’s river eighty-five years before Hudson, by actual exploration of it, made himself its discoverer.  But Verrazano, by his own showing, came but a little way into the Upper Bay—­which he called a lake—­and he made no exploration of a practical sort of the harbor that he had found.

It is but simple justice to Verrazano and to Gomez to put on record here, along with the story of Hudson’s effective discovery, the story of their ineffective finding.  Fate was against them as distinctly as it was with Hudson.  They came under adverse conditions, and they came too soon.  Back of the explorer in the French service there was not an alert power eager for colonial expansion.  Back of the explorer in the Spanish service there was a power so busied with colonial expansion on a huge scale—­in that very year, 1524, Cortes was completing his conquest of Mexico, and Pizarro was beginning his conquest of Peru—­that a farther enlargement of the colonization contract was impossible.

[Illustration:  FAC-simile of title-page of the most famous sea handbook of Hudson’s time]

Therefore we may fall back upon the assured fact—­in which I see again the touch of fatalism—­that not until Hudson came at the right moment, and at the right moment gave an accurate account of his explorations to a power that was ready immediately to colonize the land that he had found, were our port and our river, notwithstanding their earlier technical discovery, truly discovered to the world.  As for the river, it assuredly is Hudson’s very own.