“The question is,” said the SPEAKER, “that this Bill be now read a Third Time.”  Before KEAY realised situation, House is cleared for Division, and his final speech on Land Purchase Bill remains unspoken.

Business done.—­Irish Land Bill read a Third Time by 225 votes against 96.

Tuesday.—­GORST gave House to-night thorough surprise.  The SQUIRE of MALWOOD brought on Manipur business; moved Resolution asking for more papers.  Incidentally indicted the Government at home and in India.  GORST put up to reply.  An average Minister would have made an ordinary speech; GORST’s reply accepted by common consent as the most extraordinary ever heard from the Treasury Bench since DIZZY left it.  Instead of evading responsibilities, colouring facts, doing what Ministers usually do when in a fix, GORST simply, boldly, cynically, told the truth.  The SENAPATTI of MANIPUR was an ambitious, capable, popular man who might breed mischief for the rule of the EMPRESS of INDIA.  So the SENAPATTI must be got rid of at earliest possible moment, and in most absolutely complete fashion.  Arbitrary this; tyrannical perhaps; unjust possibly.  None of GORST’s business to defend or extenuate it.  All he could say was it is not a new thing; done wherever British flag waves under foreign skies; in New Zealand with the Maori King; in South Africa with CETEWAYO; in Egypt with ARABI; in the Soudan with ZEBEHR.  “In India,” said GORST, leaning his elbow lightly on the table, “they have always hated and discouraged independent and original talent; always loved and promoted mediocrity.”

As he finished this pregnant and delightful aphorism, GORST looked up at the Peers’ Gallery, where sat his Chief, GRAND CROSS, successor of CLIVE in the Government of India.  His glance travelled downward, till it rested on the Treasury Bench, and fell gently on the figure of OLD MORALITY.

How DIZZY would have delighted in this speech, with this last exquisite touch!  The SQUIRE of MALWOOD, in his secret breast, not less appreciative; but debate must be kept up, and he joined in the hue and cry with which Mediocrity resented this fresh and original way of treating things.  Even CAMPBELL-BANNERMAN shook his head.  “It is brilliant,” he said, “but it is not discretion.”

Business done.—­A good deal.

Thursday.—­Government met with awkward defeat on Factories Bill.  Not quite certain to whom they chiefly owe it, whether to GORST or MATTHEWS.  Question arose on SYDNEY BUXTON’s Amendment, raising the age of child-labourers to a minimum of eleven years.  Debate lasted all night; a pleasant contrast to the unreality of Irish Debate; Benches crowded; audience interested; speeches practical; GORST in attendance, though doubtful whether he would speak.  Usually sits in modest retirement under shadow of SPEAKER’s Chair.  To-night marked slight difference of opinion from his colleagues by taking up corner-seat on Treasury Bench by Gangway, quite out of reach of hand-shake from HOME SECRETARY.