Scientific American Supplement, No. 530, February 27, 1886 eBook

This eBook from the Gutenberg Project consists of approximately 135 pages of information about Scientific American Supplement, No. 530, February 27, 1886.

Scientific American Supplement, No. 530, February 27, 1886 eBook

This eBook from the Gutenberg Project consists of approximately 135 pages of information about Scientific American Supplement, No. 530, February 27, 1886.
in the darke; whose Wife discourseth very perfectly with him by a strange way of Arthrologie or Alphabet contrived on the joynts of his Fingers; who taking him by the hand in the night, can so discourse with him very exactly; for he feeling the joynts which she toucheth for letters, by them collected into words, very readily conceives what shee would suggest unto him.  By which examples [referring to this case and to that of an abbot who became deaf, dumb, and blind, who understood writing traced upon his naked arm] you may see how ready upon any invitation of Art, the Tact is, to supply the defect, and to officiate for any or all of the other senses, as being the most faithfull sense to man, being both the Founder, and Vicar generall to all the rest."[8]

[Footnote 8:  Philocophus:  or, THE DEAFE and Dumbe Mans Friend.  By I.B. [John Bulwer] sirnamed the Chorosopher.  London, 1648.  Pp. 106,107.]

Dr. Alexander Graham Bell has modified the Dalgarno alphabet, and has made considerable use of it in its modified form as figured in the Annals, vol. xxviii., page 133.  He esteems it highly for certain purposes, especially as employing touch to assist the sight or to release the sight for other employment, as in reading speech for instance.  Here a touch-alphabet may be an efficient aid to the sight, as the touch may fairly keep pace with the rapidity of oral expression in deliberate speech.  An objection of Dr. Kitto to the two-hand alphabet so widely know by school-children and others in Great Britain and in this country would seem to apply with greater force to the Dalgarno alphabet:  “To hit the right digit on all occasions is by far the most difficult point to learn in the use of the [two-hand] manual alphabet, and it is hard to be sure which fingers have been touched."[9]

[Footnote 9:  Dr. Kitto remaks the following common mistakes in reading rapid two-hand spelling:  the confounding i with e or o; d with p; l with t; f with x; r with t and with one form of j; n with v, and adds:  “Upon the whole, the system is very defective, and is capable of great improvement.” _—­The Lost Senses_, p. 107.]

It is not the purpose of the writer to attempt even a catalogue of the numerous finger alphabets, common, tactile, phonetic, “phonomimic,” “phonodactylologic,” and syllabic, which have been proposed for the special use of the deaf.

The one-hand alphabet used by Ponce and figured by Bonet was common in Spanish almanacs hawked by ballad-mongers upon the streets of Madrid in the days of De l’Epee, and although rejected by him, it was adopted by his pupils.  This with slight modifications became the French manual alphabet which was introduced at Hartford by Dr. Thomas Hopkins Gallaudet.  This alphabet is known in almost every hamlet in the land.  Slight changes in the form of certain letters, or in the position of the hand, in the direction of greater perspicuity and capacity for rapid use, have taken place gradually, though there is no absolute uniformity of usage among instructors or pupils.

Copyrights
Project Gutenberg
Scientific American Supplement, No. 530, February 27, 1886 from Project Gutenberg. Public domain.