the four Gospels” (Marsh’s “Michaelis,” vol. i., p. 354, as quoted in Norton’s “Genuineness of the Gospels,” vol. i., p. 3).  Very heavily does this tell against the authenticity of these records, for “if the four Gospels and other books were written by those who had been eye-witnesses of Christ’s miracles, and the five Apostolic Fathers had conversed with the Apostles, it is not to be conceived that they would not have named the actual books themselves which possessed so high authority, and would be looked up to with so much respect by all the Christians.  This is the only way in which their evidence could be of use to support the authenticity of the New Testament as being the work of the Apostles; but this is a testimony which the five Apostolical Fathers fail to supply.  There is not a single sentence, in all their remaining works, in which a clear allusion to the New Testament is to be found” ("Christian Records,” Rev. Dr. Giles, p. 50).

Westcott, while claiming in the Apostolic Fathers a knowledge of most of the epistles, writes very doubtfully as to their knowledge of the Gospels (see above p. 264), and after giving careful citations of all possible quotations, he sums up thus:  “1.  No evangelic reference in the Apostolic Fathers can be referred certainly to a written record. 2.  It appears most probable from the form of the quotations that they were derived from oral tradition. 3.  No quotation contains any element which is not substantially preserved in our Gospels. 4.  When the text given differs from the text of our Gospels it represents a later form of the evangelic tradition. 5.  The text of St. Matthew corresponds more nearly than the other synoptic texts with the quotations and references as a whole” ("On the Canon,” p. 62).  There appears to be no proof whatever of conclusions 3 and 4, but we give them all as they stand.  But we will take these Apostolic Fathers one by one, in the order used by Paley.

BARNABAS.  We have already quoted Bishop Marsh and Dr. Giles as regards him.  There is “nothing in this epistle worthy of the name of evidence even of the existence of our Gospels” ("Sup.  Rel.,” vol. i., p. 260).  The quotation sometimes urged, “There are many called, few chosen,” is spoken of by Westcott as a “proverbial phrase,” and phrases similar in meaning and manner may be found in iv.  Ezra, viii. 3, ix. 15 ("Sup.  Rel.,” vol. i., p. 245); in the latter work the words occur in a relation similar to that in which we find them in Barnabas; in both the judgment is described, and in both the moral drawn is that there are many lost and few saved; it is the more likely that the quotation is taken from the apocryphal work, since many other quotations are drawn from it throughout the epistle.  The quotation “Give to every one that asketh thee,” is not found in the supposed oldest MS., the Codex Sinaiticus, and is a later interpolation, clearly written in by some transcriber as appropriate to the passage in Barnabas.  The last supposed quotation, that Christ