passions without reluctance or remorse—­who confounded, in short, all difference between just and unjust, to satisfy their impious ambition, and whose spiritual empire was such a diversified scene of iniquity and violence as never was exhibited under any of those temporal tyrants who have been the scourges of mankind” (p. 221).  Such is the verdict passed on Christian rule by a Christian historian.  In the East we see such men as Theophylact; “this exemplary prelate, who sold every ecclesiastical benefice as soon as it became vacant, had in his stable above 2000 hunting horses, which he fed with pignuts, pistachios, dates, dried grapes, figs steeped in the most exquisite wines, to all which he added the richest perfumes.  One Holy Thursday, as he was celebrating high-mass, his groom brought him the joyful news that one of his favourite mares had foaled; upon which he threw down the Liturgy, left the church, and ran in raptures to the stable, where, having expressed his joy at that grand event, he returned to the altar to finish the divine service, which he had left interrupted during his absence” (p. 221, note).  We shall see, in a moment, how the masses of the people were housed and fed while such insane luxury surrounded horses.  In the west, the weary tale of the Roman pontiffs cannot all be narrated here.  Take the picture as drawn by Hallam:  “This dreary interval is filled up, in the annals of the papacy, by a series of revolutions and crimes.  Six popes were deposed, two murdered, one mutilated.  Frequently two, or even three, competitors, among whom it is not always possible by any genuine criticism to distinguish the true shepherd, drove each other alternately from the city.  A few respectable names appear thinly scattered through this darkness; and sometimes, perhaps, a pope who had acquired estimation by his private virtues may be distinguished by some encroachment on the rights of princes, or the privileges of national churches.  But, in general, the pontiffs of that age had neither leisure nor capacity to perfect the great system of temporal supremacy, and looked rather to a vile profit from the sale of episcopal confirmations, or of exemptions to monasteries.  The corruption of the head extended naturally to all other members of the Church.  All writers concur in stigmatizing the dissoluteness and neglect of decency that prevailed among the clergy.  Though several codes of ecclesiastical discipline had been compiled by particular prelates, yet neither these nor the ancient canons were much regarded.  The bishops, indeed, who were to enforce them, had most occasion to dread their severity.  They were obtruded upon their sees, as the supreme pontiffs were upon that of Rome, by force or corruption.  A child of five years old was made Archbishop of Rheims.  The see of Narbonne was purchased for another at the age of ten” ("Europe during the Middle Ages,” p. 353, ed. 1869).  John X. made pope at the solicitation of his mistress Theodora, the mother-in-law of the