While at coll. he had written some not very successful
verse. His Heroic Stanzas on the Death of
Oliver Cromwell (1658) was his first considerable
poem. It was followed, in 1660, by Astraea
Redux, in honour of the Restoration. The
interval of 18 months had been crowded with events,
and though much has been written against his apparent
change of opinion, it is fair to remember that the
whole cast of his mind led him to be a supporter of
de facto authority. In 1663 he m.
Lady Elizabeth Howard, dau. of the Earl of
Berkshire. The Restoration introduced a revival
of the drama in its most debased form, and for many
years D. was a prolific playwright, but though his
vigorous powers enabled him to work effectively in
this department, as in every other in which he engaged,
it was not his natural line, and happily his fame
does not rest upon his plays, which are deeply stained
with the immorality of the age. His first effort,
The Wild Gallant (1663), was a failure; his
next, The Rival Ladies, a tragi-comedy, established
his reputation, and among his other dramas may be
mentioned The Indian Queene, Amboyna
(1673), Tyrannic Love (1669), Almanzar and
Almahide (ridiculed in Buckingham’s Rehearsal)
(1670), Arungzebe (1675), All for Love
(an adaptation of Shakespeare’s Antony and
Cleopatra) (1678). During the great plague,
1665, D. left London, and lived with his father-in-law
at Charleton. On his return he pub. his
first poem of real power, Annus Mirabilis, of
which the subjects were the great fire, and the Dutch
War. In 1668 appeared his Essay on Dramatic
Poetry in the form of a dialogue, fine alike as
criticism and as prose. Two years later (1670)
he became Poet Laureate and Historiographer Royal
with a pension of L300 a year. D. was now in
prosperous circumstances, having received a portion
with his wife, and besides the salaries of his appointments,
and his profits from literature, holding a valuable
share in the King’s play-house. In 1671
G. Villiers, Duke of Buckingham, produced his Rehearsal,
in ridicule of the overdone heroics of the prevailing
drama, and satirising D. as Mr. Bayes. To this
D. made no immediate reply, but bided his time.
The next years were devoted to the drama. But
by this time public affairs were assuming a critical
aspect. A large section of the nation was becoming
alarmed at the prospect of the succession of the Duke
of York, and a restoration of popery, and Shaftesbury
was supposed to be promoting the claims of the Duke
of Monmouth. And now D. showed; his full powers.
The first part of Absalom and Achitophel appeared
in 1681, in which Charles figures as “David,”
Shaftesbury as “Achitophel,” Monmouth as
“Absalom,” Buckingham as “Zimri,”
in the short but crushing delineation of whom the
attack of the Rehearsal was requited in the
most ample measure. The effect; of the poem was


