[62] Buecheler, Carmina Latino epigraphica, No. 899.

[63] No. 19.

[64] No. 866.

[65] No. 863.

[66] No. 937.

[67] No. 949.

[68] No. 943.

[69] No. 945.

[70] No. 354.

[71] Corpus Inscriptionum Latinarum, IV, 6892.

[72] Buecheler, No. 928.

[73] No. 333.

[74] No. 931.

[75] No. 933.

[76] No. 38.

[77] No. 270.

[78] Habeat scabiem quisquis ad me venerit novissimus.

[79] Rex erit qui recte faciet, qui non faciet non erit.

[80]

    Gallos Caesar in triumphum ducit, idem in curiam;
    Galli bracas deposuerunt, latum clavom sumpserunt.

[81]

    Brutus quia reges eiecit, consul primus factus est;
    Hic quia consoles eiecit, rex postremo factus est.

[82] Salva Roma, salva patria, salvus est Germanicus.

[83] Cf. Schmid, “Der griechische Roman,” Neue Jahrb., Bd XIII (1904), 465-85; Wilcken, in Hermes, XXVIII, 161 ff., and in Archiv f.  Papyrusforschung, I, 255 ff.; Grenfell-Hunt, Fayum Towns and Their Papyri (1900), 75 ff., and Rivista di Filologia, XXIII, I ff.

[84] Some of the important late discussions of the Milesian tale are by Buerger, Hermes (1892), 351 ff.; Norden, Die antike Kunstprosa, II, 602, 604, n.; Rohde, Kleine Schriften, II, 25 ff.; Buerger, Studien zur Geschichte d. griech.  Romans, I (Programm von Blankenburg a.  H., 1902); W. Schmid, Neue Jahrb. f. d. klass.  Alt. (1904), 474 ff.; Lucas, “Zu den Milesiaca des Aristides,” Philologus, 61 (1907), 16 ff.

[85] On the origin of the prosimetrum cf. Hirzel, Der Dialog, 381 ff.; Norden, Die antike Kunstprosa, 755.

[86] Cf. Rosenbluth, Beitraege zur Quellenkunde von Petrons Satiren.  Berlin, 1909.

[87] This theory in the main is suggested by Rohde, Der griechische Roman, 2d ed., 267 (Leipzig, 1900), and by Ribbeck, Geschichte d. roem.  Dichtung, 2d ed., III, 150.

[88] Corpus Inscriptionum Latinarum, vol.  III, pp. 1926-1953.  Mommsen’s text with a commentary has been published by H. Bluemner, in Der Maximaltarif des Diocletian, Berlin, 1893.  A brief description of the edict may be found in the Pauly-Wissowa Real-Encyclopadie der classischen Altertumswissenschaft, under “Edictum Diocletiani,” and K. Buecher has discussed some points in it in the Zeitschrift fuer die gesamte Staatswissenschaft, vol.  L (1894), pp. 189-219 and 672-717.

[89] The method of arrangement may be illustrated by an extract from the first table, which deals with grain and vegetables.