by us, to his agent Monsieur Le Bas, for his use.  The third is a blunder, that I say Guiscard’s design was against Mr. Secretary St. John, and yet my reasonings upon it, are, as if it were personal against Mr. Harley.  But I say no such thing, and my reasonings are just; I relate only what Guiscard said in Newgate, because it was a particularity the reader might be curious to know (and accordingly it lies in a paragraph by itself, after my reflections)[8] but I never meant to be answerable for what Guiscard said, or thought it of weight enough for me to draw conclusions from thence, when I had the Address of both Houses to direct me better; where it is expressly said,[9] “That Mr. Harley’s fidelity to her Majesty, and zeal for her service, have drawn upon him the hatred of all the abettors of Popery and faction."[10] This is what I believe, and what I shall stick to.

But alas, these are not the passages which have raised so much fury against me.  One or two mistakes in facts of no importance, or a single blunder, would not have provoked them; they are not so tender of my reputation as a writer.  All their outrage is occasioned by those passages in that paper, which they do not in the least pretend to answer, and with the utmost reluctancy are forced to mention.  They take abundance of pains to clear Guiscard from a design against Mr. Harley’s life, but offer not one argument to clear their other friends, who in the business of Gregg, were equally guilty of the same design against the same person; whose tongues were very swords, and whose penknives were axes.

[Footnote 1:  No. 33 in the reprint. [T.S.]]

[Footnote 2:  Cicero, “Ep. ad Att.,” xv. 13.  “As to the maintenance of liberty—­surely the most precious thing in the world—­I agree with you.”—­E.S.  SHUCKBURGH.]

[Footnote 3:  The following pamphlets may be instanced:—­“Julian the Apostate,” [by S. Johnson], 1682; “[Passive Obedience] A Sermon preached before the ...  Lord Mayor,” etc., by B. Calamy, 1683; “Passive Obedience Stated and Asserted,” by T. Pomfret, 1683; “The Doctrine of Non-Resistance,” [by E. Bohun], 1689; “History of Passive Obedience,” [by A. Seller], 1689; “A Discourse concerning the Unreasonableness,” etc. [by E. Stillingfleet], 1689; “Christianity, a Doctrine of the Cross,” [by J. Kettlewell], 1691; and “The Measures of Submission,” by B. Hoadly, 1706. [T.S.]]

[Footnote 4:  The Act declaring the Rights and Liberties of the Subject (1 Will. and Mary, Sess. 2, c. 2), and the Act for the Further Limitation of the Crown (12 and 13 Will.  III. c. 2), limited the power of the Crown in various respects. [T.S.]]

[Footnote 5:  “The Commonwealth of Oceana,” by James Harrington, 1656. [T.S.]]

[Footnote 6:  Henry Dodwell (1641-1711), non-juror, and author of “An Admonitory Discourse ...  Schism” (1704), “Occasional Communion” (1705), etc.

George Hickes (1642-1715), non-juror.  Dean of Worcester (1683-91), and author of “The Pretences of the Prince of Wales Examined, and Rejected” (1701).