the scope of his destiny.  The history of the earth, the motions of the heavenly bodies, suggest already modes of being higher than ours, and which fulfil more deeply the office of interpretation.  But I do suppose man’s life to be the rivet in one series of the great chain, and that all higher existences are analogous to his.  Music suggests their mode of being, and, when carried up on its strong wings, we foresee how the next step in the soul’s ascension shall interpret man to the universe, as he now interprets those forms beneath himself. * *

’The law of Spirit is identical, whether displaying itself as genius, or as piety, but its modes of expression are distinct dialects.  All souls desire to become the fathers of souls, as citizens, legislators, poets, artists, sages, saints; and, so far as they are true to the law of their incorruptible essence, they are all Anointed, all Emanuel, all Messiah; but they are all brutes and devils so far as subjected to the law of corruptible existence.

’As wherever there is a tendency a form is gradually evolved, as its Type,—­so is it the law of each class and order of human thoughts to produce a form which shall be the visible representation of its aim and strivings, and stand before it as its King.  This effort to produce a kingly type it was, that clothed itself with power as Brahma or Osiris, that gave laws as Confucius or Moses, that embodied music and eloquence in the Apollo.  This it was that incarnated itself, at one time as Plato, at another as Michel Angelo, at another as Luther, &c.  Ever seeking, it has produced Ideal after Ideal of the beauty, into which mankind is capable of being developed; and one of the highest, in some respects the very highest, of these kingly types, was the life of Jesus of Nazareth.

’Few believe more in his history than myself, and it is very dear to me.  I believe, in my own way, in the long preparation of ages for his coming, and the truth of prophecy that announced him.  I see a necessity, in the character of Jesus, why Abraham should have been the founder of his nation, Moses its lawgiver, and David its king and poet.  I believe in the genesis of the patriarchs, as given in the Old Testament.  I believe in the prophets,—­that they foreknew not only what their nation longed for, but what the development of universal Man requires,—­a Redeemer, an Atoner, a Lamb of God, taking away the sins of the world.  I believe that Jesus came when the time was ripe, and that he was peculiarly a messenger and Son of God.  I have nothing to say in denial of the story of his birth; whatever the actual circumstances were, he was born of a Virgin, and the tale expresses a truth of the soul.  I have no objection to the miracles, except where they do not happen to please one’s feelings.  Why should not a spirit, so consecrate and intent, develop new laws, and make matter plastic?  I can imagine him walking the waves, without any violation