Did the adversary of Michel Ardan’s theories hazard any further arguments?  It is impossible to say, for the frantic cries of the crowd would have prevented any opinion from being promulgated.  When silence was again restored, even in the most distant groups, the triumphant orator contented himself with adding the following considerations:—­

“You will think, gentlemen, that I have hardly touched upon this grave question.  I am not here to give you an instructive lecture upon this vast subject.  There is another series of arguments in favour of the heavenly bodies being inhabited; I do not look upon that.  Allow me only to insist upon one point.  To the people who maintain that the planets are not inhabited you must answer, ’You may be right if it is demonstrated that the earth is the best of possible worlds; but it is not so, notwithstanding Voltaire.’  It has only one satellite, whilst Jupiter, Uranus, Saturn, and Neptune have several at their service, an advantage that is not to be disdained.  But that which now renders the earth an uncomfortable place of abode is the inclination of its axis upon its orbit.  Hence the inequality of day and night; hence the unfortunate diversity of seasons.  Upon our miserable spheroid it is always either too warm or too cold; we are frozen in winter and roasted in summer; it is the planet of colds, rheumatism, and consumption, whilst on the surface of Jupiter, for instance, where the axis has only a very slight inclination, the inhabitants can enjoy invariable temperature.  There is the perpetual spring, summer, autumn, and winter zone; each ‘Jovian’ may choose the climate that suits him, and may shelter himself all his life from the variations of the temperature.  You will doubtless agree to this superiority of Jupiter over our planet without speaking of its years, which each lasts twelve years!  What is more, it is evident to me that, under these auspices, and under such marvellous conditions of existence, the inhabitants of that fortunate world are superior beings—­that savants are more learned, artists more artistic, the wicked less wicked, and the good are better.  Alas! what is wanting to our spheroid to reach this perfection is very little!—­an axis of rotation less inclined on the plane of its orbit.”

“Well!” cried an impetuous voice, “let us unite our efforts, invent machines, and rectify the earth’s axis!”

Thunders of applause greeted this proposition, the author of which could be no other than J.T.  Maston.  It is probable that the fiery secretary had been carried away by his instincts as engineer to venture such a proposition; but it must be said, for it is the truth, many encouraged him with their cries, and doubtless, if they had found the resting-point demanded by Archimedes, the Americans would have constructed a lever capable of raising the world and redressing its axis.  But this point was wanting to these bold mechanicians.

Nevertheless, this eminently practical idea had enormous success:  the discussion was suspended for a good quarter of an hour, and long, very long afterwards, they talked in the United States of America of the proposition so energetically enunciated by the perpetual secretary of the Gun Club.