a large arrear, which occasioned his being active in his master’s assassination.  But of this I know no other evidence than Creichton’s assertion, and a hint in Wodrow.  Burly, for that is his most common designation, was brother-in-law to Hackston of Rathillet a wild enthusiastic character, who joined daring courage, and skill in the sword, to the fiery zeal of his sect.  Burly, himself, was less eminent for religious fervour than for the active and violent share which he had in the most desperate enterprises of his party.  His name does not appear among the covenanters, who were denounced for the affair of Pentland.  But, in 1677, Robert Hamilton, afterwards commander of the insurgents at Loudon Hill, and Bothwell Bridge, with several other non-conformists, were assembled at this Burly’s house, in Fife.  There they were attacked by a party of soldiers, commanded by Captain Carstairs, whom they beat off, wounding desperately one of his party.  For this resistance to authority, they were declared rebels.  The next exploit, in which Burly was engaged, was of a bloodier complexion, and more dreadful celebrity.  It is well known, that James Sharpe, archbishop of St Andrews, was regarded, by the rigid presbyterians, not only as a renegade, who had turned back from the spiritual plough, but as the principal author of the rigours exercised against their sect.  He employed, as an agent of his oppression, one Carmichael, a decayed gentleman.  The industry of this man, in procuring information, and in enforcing the severe penalties against conventiclers, having excited the resentment of the Cameronians, nine of their number, of whom Burly, and his brother-in-law, Hackston, were the leaders, assembled, with the purpose of way-laying and murdering Carmichael; but, while they searched for him in vain, they received tidings that the archbishop himself was at hand.  The party resorted to prayer; after which, they agreed, unanimously, that the Lord had delivered the wicked Haman into their hand.  In the execution of the supposed will of heaven, they agreed to put themselves under the command of a leader; and they requested Hackston of Rathillet to accept the office, which he declined alleging, that, should he comply with their request, the slaughter might be imputed to a private quarrel, which existed betwixt him and the archbishop.  The command was then offered to Burly, who accepted it without scruple; and they galloped off in pursuit of the archbishop’s carriage, which contained himself and his daughter.  Being well mounted, they easily overtook and disarmed the prelate’s attendants.  Burly, crying out, “Judas, be taken!” rode up to the carriage, wounded the postillion and ham-strung one of the horses.  He then fired into the coach a piece, charged with several bullets, so near, that the archbishop’s gown was set on fire.  The rest, coming up, dismounted, and dragged him out of the carriage, when, frightened and wounded, he crawled towards Hackston, who still