but absolutely free from offence. I did not see
it until it had reached its eighth night, and I do
not remember a piece, taken as a whole, so excellently
acted. Although he does not appear until the
Second Act, Mr. WILLIE EDOUIN, as
’Arry ’Ooker,
the Private Inquiry Agent, is
the feature of
the performance. His politeness to ladies, his
assumption of businesslike habits, suggested by his
reading and spiking of bogus telegrams brought to
him when he is engaged with a client, his urbanity
under difficulties, and his cheerful acceptance of
the inevitable in whatever shape presented, are all
admirable points, and points that are fully appreciated
by the audience. Roars of laughter follow the
one after the other when
’Arry ’Ooker
is on the stage. Nothing can be more absurd than
his make-up, his bows, his grimaces, and yet under
the surface there is a vein of pathos that causes one
to feel a pang of genuine regret when the poverty-stricken,
light-hearted rogue, who, if he cannot secure a hundred
guineas, is equally ready to accept a “tenner,”
is marched oft to penal servitude as the Curtain falls.
The clerk of this entertaining individual,
Toby,
is played by a boy like a boy, by Master Buss.
Farther, Mr. ALFRED MALTBY could not be better as
the suspicious and bamboozled husband,
Richard Wrackham.
Again, even the small part of
Alexander, a
Waiter, is well played. Once more—the
ladies, without exception, are capital; and as a result
of this all-round excellence, the piece “goes,”
from a quarter to nine till just eleven, with a
verve
that must be most satisfactory to all concerned.
So I can congratulate the Author upon a piece full
of lines that tell, and the Manager upon a play that
is likely to rival in popularity its predecessor,
the phenomenally-successful
Our Flat. And I
can offer these congratulations with a dear conscience,
because I am neither Author of the piece nor Manager
of the theatre, but as Mr. RUDYARD KIPLING might observe,
QUITE ANOTHER FELLOW.
* * * *
*
LARKS!
SIR,—I am surprised that any of your Correspondents
should doubt that birds eat snow. There is a
bull-finch in my aviary, and I tried him. He
ate it ravenously. Strange to say, he has not
uttered a sound since! My wife says, “Probably
his pipe is frozen.” This is such
a good joke, I think you ought to have it.
Yours, LOVER OF NATURE.
SIR,—You may like to have the following
story in support of the idea that animals are aware
that snow is frozen water. It was related to
me by a rather rackety nephew, who has lived part of
his life in South America, and whose word can be strictly
relied on. He relates that once, when he was
travelling among the Andes, at an elevation of some
twenty thousand feet, his mules became very thirsty,
and no water was obtainable. Each animal seized
a calabash with its teeth, filled it with snow,
and trotted off to the crater of an adjacent volcano;
it then waited till the lava melted the snow, which
it drank up, and finally trotted back again.
My nephew says he should not have believed a mule
could be so clever, if he had not seen it.