It is now very long since the English people have by force subverted a government.  During the 160 years which preceded the union of the Roses, nine kings reigned in England.  Six of those kings were deposed.  Five lost their lives as well as their crowns.  Yet it is certain that all through that period the English people were far better governed than were the Belgians under Philip the Good, or the French under that Louis who was styled the Father of his people.  The people, skilled in the use of arms, had in reserve that check of physical force which brought the proudest king to reason.

One wise policy was during the Middle Ages pursued by England alone.  Though to the monarch belonged the power of the sword, the nation retained the power of the purse.  The Continental nations ought to have acted likewise; as they failed to conserve this safeguard of representation with taxation, the consequence was that everywhere excepting in England parliamentary institutions ceased to exist.  England owed this singular felicity to her insular situation.

The great events of the reigns of the Tudors and the Stuarts were followed by a crisis when the crown passed from Charles II. to his brother, James II.  The new king commenced his administration with a large measure of public good will.  He was a prince who had been driven into exile by a faction which had tried to rob him of his birthright, on the ground that he was a deadly enemy to the religion and laws of England.  He had triumphed, he was on the throne, and his first act was to declare that he would defend the Church and respect the rights of the people.

But James had not been many hours king when violent disputes arose.  The first was between the two heads of the law, concerning customs and the levying of taxes.  Moreover, the time drew near for summoning Parliament, and the king’s mind was haunted by an apprehension, not to be mentioned, even at this distance of time, without shame and indignation.  He was afraid that by summoning his Parliament he might incur the displeasure of the King of France.  Rochester, Godolphin, and Sunderland, who formed the interior Cabinet, were perfectly aware that their late master, Charles II., had been in the habit of receiving money from the court of Versailles.  They understood the expediency of keeping Louis in good humour, but knew that the summoning of the legislature was not a matter of choice.

As soon as the French king heard of the death of Charles and of the accession of James, he hastened to send to the latter a munificent donation of L35,000.  James was not ashamed to shed tears of delight and gratitude.  Young Lord Churchill was sent as extraordinary ambassador to Versailles to assure Louis of the gratitude and affection of the King of England.  This brilliant young soldier had in his 23rd year distinguished himself amongst thousands of brave men by his serene intrepidity when engaged with his regiment in operations, together with French forces against Holland.  Unhappily, the splendid qualities of John Churchill were mingled with alloy of the most sordid kind.