“But surely you know it is only the Printing Press that has stereotyped our liturgy, that for Maimonides and Ibn Ezra, for David Kimchi and Joseph Albo, the contents were fluid, that—­”

“We don’t deny that,” interrupted Schlesinger drily.  “But we can’t have any more alterations now-a-days.  Who is there worthy to alter them?  You?”

“Certainly not.  I merely suggest.”

“You are playing into the hands of our enemies,” said De Haan, shaking his head.  “We must not let our readers even imagine that the prayer-book can be tampered with.  It’s the thin end of the wedge.  To trim our liturgy is like trimming living flesh; wherever you cut, the blood oozes.  The four cubits of the Halacha—­that is what is wanted, not changes in the liturgy.  Once touch anything, and where are you to stop?  Our religion becomes a flux.  Our old Judaism is like an old family mansion, where each generation has left a memorial and where every room is hallowed with traditions of merrymaking and mourning.  We do not want our fathers’ home decorated in the latest style; the next step will be removal to a new dwelling altogether.  On page 3 you refer to the second Isaiah.”

“But I deny that there were two Isaiahs.”

“So you do; but it is better for our readers not to hear of such impious theories.  The space would be much better occupied in explaining the Portion for the week.  The next leaderette has a flippant tone, which has excited unfavorable comment among some of the most important members of the Dalston Synagogue.  They object to humor in a religious paper.  On page 4 you have deliberately missed an opportunity of puffing the Kosher Co-operative Society.  Indeed, there is not a word throughout about our Society.  But I like Mr. Henry Goldsmith’s letter on this page, though; he is a good orthodox man and he writes from a good address.  It will show we are not only read in the East End.  Pity he’s such a Man-of-the-Earth, though.  Yes, and that’s good—­the communication from the Rev. Joseph Strelitski.  I think he’s a bit of an Epikouros but it looks as if the whole of the Kensington Synagogue was with us.  I understand he is a friend of yours:  it will be as well for you to continue friendly.  Several of us here knew him well in Olov Hasholom times, but he is become so grand and rarely shows himself at the Holy Land League Meetings.  He can help us a lot if he will.”

“Oh, I’m sure he will,” said Raphael.

“That’s good,” said De Haan, caressing his white beard.  Then growing gloomy again, he went on, “On page 5 you have a little article by Gabriel Hamburg, a well-known Epikouros.”

“Oh, but he’s one of the greatest scholars in Europe!” broke in Raphael.  “I thought you’d be extra pleased to have it.  He sent it to me from Stockholm as a special favor.”  He did not mention he had secretly paid for it.  “I know some of his views are heterodox, and I don’t agree with half he says, but this article is perfectly harmless.”