a misconception as to the origin of this government and its true character.  It is, Sir, the people’s Constitution, the people’s government, made for the people, made by the people, and answerable to the people.  The people of the United States have declared that this Constitution shall be the supreme law.  We must either admit the proposition, or dispute their authority.  The States are, unquestionably, sovereign, so far as their sovereignty is not affected by this supreme law.  But the State legislatures, as political bodies, however sovereign, are yet not sovereign over the people.  So far as the people have given power to the general government, so far the grant is unquestionably good, and the government holds of the people, and not of the State governments.  We are all agents of the same supreme power, the people.  The general government and the State governments derive their authority from the same source.  Neither can, in relation to the other, be called primary, though one is definite and restricted, and the other general and residuary.  The national government possesses those powers which it can be shown the people have conferred on it, and no more.  All the rest belongs to the State governments, or to the people themselves.  So far as the people have restrained State sovereignty, by the expression of their will, in the Constitution of the United States, so far, it must be admitted, State sovereignty is effectually controlled.  I do not contend that it is, or ought to be, controlled farther.  The sentiment to which I have referred propounds that State sovereignty is only to be controlled by its own “feeling of justice”; that is to say, it is not to be controlled at all, for one who is to follow his own feelings is under no legal control.  Now, however men may think this ought to be, the fact is, that the people of the United States have chosen to impose control on State sovereignties.  There are those, doubtless, who wish they had been left without restraint; but the Constitution has ordered the matter differently.  To make war, for instance, is an exercise of sovereignty; but the Constitution declares that no State shall make war.  To coin money is another exercise of sovereign power; but no State is at liberty to coin money.  Again, the Constitution says that no sovereign State shall be so sovereign as to make a treaty.  These prohibitions, it must be confessed, are a control on the State sovereignty of South Carolina, as well as of the other States, which does not arise “from her own feelings of honorable justice.”  The opinion referred to, therefore, is in defiance of the plainest provisions of the Constitution.