Neutral Rights and Obligations in the Anglo-Boer War eBook

This eBook from the Gutenberg Project consists of approximately 168 pages of information about Neutral Rights and Obligations in the Anglo-Boer War.

Neutral Rights and Obligations in the Anglo-Boer War eBook

This eBook from the Gutenberg Project consists of approximately 168 pages of information about Neutral Rights and Obligations in the Anglo-Boer War.

[Footnote 31:  The New Orleans Picayune, Mar. 28, 1902.]

The evidence which Pearson was able to place before Governor Heard and which the latter laid before the President seemed to substantiate the fact that at least one of the ports of the United States had been constantly used and was then being used as a base of military transportation to the British forces in South Africa.  It was shown that William B. Leonard, of New Orleans, had contracted with Major H.J.  Scobell, representing the British Government, for the purchase of mules to be shipped to South Africa for military purposes.  The contract had been signed in October, 1899, and during the months from October, 1899, to May, 1900, large numbers had been shipped to South Africa under the immediate direction of British army officers.[32] P.B.  Lynch made affidavit that he had been employed as clerk and bookkeeper in the bureau of the British remount service in New Orleans from December, 1899, to September, 1901.  He explained the operations of the remount service as well as its methods, and indicated clearly the direct connection of regularly appointed officers of the British army with the purchase and shipment of horses and mules to South Africa.  The purchases, it seems, were made at different points in the country and afterward assembled at a place designated by the officer in charge in New Orleans.  The British army brand was then placed upon the animals, which were immediately consigned to the British officer in New Orleans but without giving his military title.  They were then transferred to ships the charter parties of which were agents of the English Government.  It was shown that the ships’ agents usually employed muleteers taken on by tugs from the city of New Orleans, and it was proved that the whole operation was controlled by English army officers who were detailed from London or from South Africa for the purpose.[33]

[Footnote 32:  Leonard v.  Sparks Bros. & McGee, Civil District Court, Parish of New Orleans, Division E, No. 62,770, Feb. 24, 1902.]

[Footnote 33:  H.R., Doc. 568, 57 Cong., 1 Sess., p. 9; also pp. 10-13 passim.]

The testimony of Charles J. Cole showed that as foreman in charge of seventy or more men he had made six trips to South Africa in the service of the British Government or of its agents.  His testimony was substantiated by certificates for seamen discharged before the superintendent of a mercantile marine office in the British Empire, a British consul, or a shipping officer on board the vessel on which he had sailed.  He had been employed on the transports Prah, Montcalm, Knight Bachelor, Montezuma, and Rosetta, all engaged in transporting horses and mules to the British army in South Africa.  He testified that the transports were in charge of regular officers of the English army and that from them all orders were received.  He also avowed that many of the men were urged and solicited by the officers to join the British army, and were unable to obtain their pay unless they complied with the request.[34]

Copyrights
Project Gutenberg
Neutral Rights and Obligations in the Anglo-Boer War from Project Gutenberg. Public domain.