Not long after, he made the acquaintance of an old musician, who became interested in him, gave him a few lessons, and entered him at the Conservatoire.  There he attended the elocution classes, and a role was given to him to learn in which he had to say:  “How do you do, Papa Dugrand!” He had no success with this sentence.  Each of his four professors told him a different way of saying it, and he wondered:  “How is this?  Are there, then, no principles to go by?” One day a cousin of his arrived unexpectedly from the country.  “How do you do, my dear cousin!” And immediately after this warm greeting he ran away from his cousin, crying, excitedly, “I have it!  I have it!” and did not stop until he got to his room and in front of a looking-glass.  What he had was the right attitude and way to say, “How do you do, Papa Dugrand!” and this way was diametrically opposed to the instruction his professors had given him on the subject.

My father spent forty-five years in observing.  He was the king of observers.  What remains to us is but one-quarter of all his observations.  My father’s method is comprehensive; it can be applied to the arts, to the sciences.  His pupils were orators, painters, sculptors, comedians, lawyers, doctors, society amateurs.

My father had read in the first chapter of Genesis that God made man in His image.  God is Trinity.  Trinity is the criterion of my father.

Raymond Brucker was an old friend of my father’s.  “What is this method of your friend Delsarte?” was a question often put to him.  “Delsarte’s method,” he would reply, “is an orthopedic machine to straighten crippled intellects.”

My father considered man as the principle of all arts.  He used three terms to express man:  Life, mind and soul.  He would compare man to a carriage occupied by a traveler.  In front sits a coachman, who drives the horse.  The carriage is the body of man; the horse that makes it move is life; the coachman who drives the horse is the mind; the occupant of the carriage, who gives orders to the coachman, is the soul.  Man feels, thinks and loves.

My father made use of three terms to express three states:  Concentric, normal and excentric.  These he would combine with each other.  I will show you, for example, the three concentric attitudes of the hand:  The concentro-concentric, expressing struggle; the concentro-normal, meaning power; the concentro-excentric, showing convulsion. [Illustrates.] In the same way we have the combinations of the eyes and eyebrows, and, again, those of the head.  The head is concentro-concentric when the eyes look in the same direction as that toward which the head inclines; this expresses veneration.  Notice how different the words, “I love him!” sound when said first with the head inclined from and then inclined toward the object.

An interesting series of movements for the arms that my father used to give is the following:  “It is impossible;” “It is not so;” “It is improbable;” “Maybe;” “It is so;” “It is evident;” “There is no doubt whatever about it.” [Illustrates.] This series is equally applicable to affirmation and to negation.  For example, you can begin by, “It is impossible that it is not true!” and continue with that meaning.