towns, the moors of Cornwall, and the collieries of
Bristol, at length London fashionable chapels.
The scene of this new movement was as like as it could
be in our modern world to a Greek polis, or
an Italian self-centred city of the Middle Ages.
Oxford stood by itself in its meadows by the rivers,
having its relations with all England, but, like its
sister at Cambridge, living a life of its own, unlike
that of any other spot in England, with its privileged
powers, and exemptions from the general law, with
its special mode of government and police, its usages
and tastes and traditions, and even costume, which
the rest of England looked at from the outside, much
interested but much puzzled, or knew only by transient
visits. And Oxford was as proud and jealous of
its own ways as Athens or Florence; and like them
it had its quaint fashions of polity; its democratic
Convocation and its oligarchy; its social ranks; its
discipline, severe in theory and usually lax in fact;
its self-governed bodies and corporations within itself;
its faculties and colleges, like the guilds and “arts”
of Florence; its internal rivalries and discords;
its “sets” and factions. Like these,
too, it professed a special recognition of the supremacy
of religion; it claimed to be a home of worship and
religious training, Dominus illuminatio mea,
a claim too often falsified in the habit and tempers
of life. It was a small sphere, but it was a
conspicuous one; for there was much strong and energetic
character, brought out by the aims and conditions of
University life; and though moving in a separate orbit,
the influence of the famous place over the outside
England, though imperfectly understood, was recognised
and great. These conditions affected the character
of the movement, and of the conflicts which it caused.
Oxford claimed to be eminently the guardian of “true
religion and sound learning”; and therefore
it was eminently the place where religion should be
recalled to its purity and strength, and also the place
where there ought to be the most vigilant jealousy
against the perversions and corruptions of religion,
Oxford was a place where every one knew his neighbour,
and measured him, and was more or less friendly or
repellent; where the customs of life brought men together
every day and all day, in converse or discussion;
and where every fresh statement or every new step
taken furnished endless material for speculation or
debate, in common rooms or in the afternoon walk.
And for this reason, too, feelings were apt to be
more keen and intense and personal than in the larger
scenes of life; the man who was disliked or distrusted
was so close to his neighbours that he was more irritating
than if he had been obscured by a crowd; the man who
attracted confidence and kindled enthusiasm, whose
voice was continually in men’s ears, and whose
private conversation and life was something ever new
in its sympathy and charm, created in those about
him not mere admiration, but passionate friendship,
or unreserved discipleship. And these feelings
passed from individuals into parties; the small factions
of a limited area. Men struck blows and loved
and hated in those days in Oxford as they hardly did
on the wider stage of London politics or general religious
controversy.