and substance, on what will you rest the claim of respect and attention which you make upon your flocks?  Hitherto you have been upheld by your birth, your education, your wealth, your connexions; should these secular advantages cease, on what must Christ’s Ministers depend?  Is not this a serious practical question?  We know how miserable is the state of religious bodies not supported by the State.  Look at the Dissenters on all sides of you, and you will see at once that their Ministers, depending simply upon the people, become the creatures of the people.  Are you content that this should be your case?  Alas! can a greater evil befall Christians, than for their teachers to be guided by them, instead of guiding?  How can we “hold fast the form of sound words,” and “keep that which is committed to our trust,” if our influence is to depend simply on our popularity?  Is it not our very office to oppose the world?  Can we then allow ourselves to court it? to preach smooth things and prophesy deceits? to make the way of life easy to the rich and indolent, and to bribe the humbler classes by excitements and strong intoxicating doctrine?  Surely it must not be so;—­and the question recurs, on what are we to rest our authority when the State deserts us?

Christ has not left His Church without claim of its own upon the attention of men.  Surely not.  Hard Master He cannot be, to bid us oppose the world, yet give us no credentials for so doing.  There are some who rest their divine mission on their own unsupported assertion; others, who rest it upon their popularity; others, on their success; and others, who rest it upon their temporal distinctions.  This last case has, perhaps, been too much our own; I fear we have neglected the real ground on which our authority is built—­OUR APOSTOLICAL DESCENT.

We have been born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God.  The Lord Jesus Christ gave His Spirit to His Apostles; they in turn laid their hands on those who should succeed them; and these again on others; and so the sacred gift has been handed down to our present bishops, who have appointed us as their assistants, and in some sense representatives.

  Now every one of us believes this.  I know that some will at first deny
  they do; still they do believe it.  Only, it is not sufficiently,
  practically impressed on their minds.

They do believe it; for it is the doctrine of the Ordination Service, which they have recognised as truth in the most solemn season of their lives.  In order, then, not to prove, but to remind and impress, I entreat your attention to the words used when you were made ministers of Christ’s Church.

  The office of Deacon was thus committed to you:  “Take thou authority
  to execute the office of a Deacon in the Church of God committed unto
  thee:  In the name, etc.”