interest in such inquiries, frequently maintained some position which to the quicker wits round him seemed a paradox or a mare’s nest.  Yet it often happened that after a dispute, carried on with a brisk fire of not always respectful objections to Marriott’s view, and in which his only advantage was the patience with which he clumsily, yet surely, brought out the real point of the matter, overlooked by others, the debate ended in the recognition that he had been right.  It was often a strange and almost distressing sight to see the difficulty under which he sometimes laboured of communicating his thoughts, as a speaker at a meeting, or as a teacher to his hearers, or even in the easiness of familiar talk.  The comfort was that he was not really discouraged.  He was wrestling with his own refractory faculty of exposition and speech; it may be, he was busy deeper down in the recesses and storehouses of his mind; but he was too much taken up with the effort to notice what people thought of it, or even if they smiled; and what he had to say was so genuine and veracious, as an expression of his meaning, so full of benevolence, charity, and generosity, and often so weighty and unexpected, that men felt it a shame to think much of the peculiarities of his long look of blank silence, and the odd, clumsy explanations which followed it.  He was a man, under an uncouth exterior, of the noblest and most affectionate nature; most patient, indulgent, and hopeful to all in whom he took an interest, even when they sorely tried his kindness and his faith in them.  Where he loved and trusted and admired, he was apt to rate very highly, sometimes too highly.  His gratitude was boundless.  He was one of those who deliberately gave up the prospect of domestic life, to which he was naturally drawn, for the sake of his cause.  Capable of abstract thought beyond most men of his time, and never unwilling to share his thoughts with those at all disposed to venture with him into deep waters, he was always ready to converse or to discuss on much more ordinary ground.  As an undergraduate and a young bachelor, he had attained, without seeking it, a position of almost unexampled authority in the junior University world that was hardly reached by any one for many years at least after him.  He was hopeless as a speaker in the Union; but with all his halting and bungling speeches, that democratic and sometimes noisy assembly bore from him with kindly amusement and real respect what they would bear from no one else, and he had an influence in its sometimes turbulent debates which seems unaccountable.  He was the vir pietate gravis.  In a once popular squib, occasioned by one of the fiercest of these debates, this unique position is noticed and commemorated—­

[Greek:  Oud’ elathen Mariota, philaitaton Oreiaelon]

* * * * *

[Greek:  Aelthe mega gronon, Masichois kai pas’ agapaetos,
Kai smeilon, prosephae pantas keindois epeesin].[33]