Matthew Clifford I have altered to Martin, as you prescribed; the blunder was my own, as well as a more considerable one, that of Lord Sandwich’s death—­which was occasioned by my supposing, at first, that the translation of Barba was made by the second Earl, whose death I had marked in the list, and forgot to alter, after I had writ the account of the father.  I shall take care to set this right, as the second volume is not yet begun to be printed.

Lord Halifax’s Maxims I have already marked down, as I shall Lord Dorset’s share in Pompey.

The account of the Duke of Wharton’s death I had from a very good hand—­Captain Willoughby; who, in the convent where the Duke died, saw a picture of him in the habit.  If it was a Bernardine convent, the gentleman might confound them; but, considering that there is no life of the Duke but bookseller’s trash, it is much more likely that they mistook.

I have no doubts about Lord Belhaven’s speeches; but unless I could verify their being published by himself, it were contrary to my rule to insert them.

If you look, Sir, into Lord Clarendon’s account of Montrose’s death, you will perceive that there is no probability of the book of his actions being composed by himself.

I will consult Sir James Ware’s book on Lord Totness’s translation; and I will mention the Earl of Cork’s Memoirs.

Lord Leppington is the Earl of Monmouth, in whose article I have taken notice of his Romulus and Tarquin.

Lord Berkeley’s book I have actually got, and shall give him an article.

There is one more passage, Sir, in your letter, which I cannot answer, without putting you to new trouble—­a liberty which all your indulgence cannot justify me in taking; else I would beg to know on what authority you attribute to Laurence Earl of Rochester[1] the famous preface to his father’s history, which I have always heard ascribed to Atterbury, Smallridge, and Aldridge.[2] The knowledge of this would be an additional favour; it would be a much greater, Sir, if coming this way, you would ever let me have the honour of seeing a gentleman to whom I am so much obliged.

[Footnote 1:  The Earl of Rochester was the second son of the Earl of Clarendon.  He was Lord Treasurer under James II., but was dismissed because he refused to change his religion (Macaulay’s “History of England,” c. 6).]

[Footnote 2:  Atterbury was the celebrated Bishop of Rochester, Smallridge was Bishop of Bristol, and Aldridge (usually written Aldrich) was Dean of Christchurch, Oxford, equally well known for his treatise on Logic and his five reasons for drinking—­

    Good wine, a friend, or being dry;
    Or lest you should be by and by,
    Or any other reason why—­]

HIS “ROYAL AND NOBLE AUTHORS”—­LORD CLARENDON—­SIR R. WALPOLE AND LORD BOLINGBROKE—­THE DUKE OF LEEDS.

TO THE REV.  HENRY ZOUCH.

STRAWBERRY HILL, Oct. 21, 1758.