[Frag.  XXXII]

1.  These proposals and a few others of similar nature they put forward not because they expected to carry any of them into effect,—­for they, if anybody, understood the purposes of the Romans,—­but in order that failing to obtain their requests they might secure an excuse for complaints, on the ground that wrong had been done them. (Mai, p. 156.)

[Sidenote:  B.C. 340 (a.u. 414)] 2.  Dio in Book 7:  “And for this reason I shall execute you, in order that even as you obtain the prize for your prowess, so you may receive the penalty for your disobedience.” [Footnote:  The migration of Alexander(?).  See Livy, VIII, 3, 6.] (Bekker, Anecd. p. 133, 19.  Zonaras, 7, 26.)

3.  The statement is made by Douris, Diodorus and Dio that when the Samnites, Etruscans and other nations were warring against the Romans, Decius, a Roman consul and associated with Torquatus in command of the troops, gave himself to be slain, and of the opposite side there were slaughtered a hundred thousand that very day.[Footnote:  Words of Torquatus to his son.] (Io.  Tzetzes, on Lycophr. 1378.  Zonaras, 7, 26.)

[Sidenote:  B.C. 340 (a.u. 414)] 4. ¶Dio says:  “I am surprised that his (Decius’s) death should have set the battle right again, should have defeated the side that was winning and have given victory to the men who were getting worsted:  I can not even comprehend what brought about the result.  When I reflect what some have accomplished,—­for we know that many such chances have befallen many persons before,—­I can not disbelieve the tradition:  but when I come to calculate the causes of it, I fall into a great dilemma.  How can you believe that from such a sacrifice of one man so great a multitude of human beings were brought over at once to safety and to victory?  Well, the truth of the matter and the causes that are responsible shall be left to others to investigate.”  (Mai, p.157.  Zonaras, 7, 26.)

5.  It was evident to every one that they had considered the outcome of the event [Footnote:  At the battle of Sentinum (295 B.C.).] and had ranged themselves on the victorious side.  Torquatus did not, however, question them about it for fear they might revolt, since the affair of the Latins was still a sore point with them.  He was not harsh in every case nor in most matters the sort of man he had shown himself toward his son:  on the contrary, he was admitted to be good at planning and good in warfare, so that it was said by the citizens and by their adversaries alike that he held success in war subservient to him, and that if he had been leader of the Latins, he would certainly have made them conquer.  (Mai, p.157, and Valesius, p.585.)