at the same time value themselves upon being impartial against their friends.  Then as to gratitude, or generosity, the Tories did not approach to the Whigs, who never suffered any man to go unrewarded, however dull, or insignificant, provided he declared himself to be for them; whereas the Tories had no general interest, and consequently no particular, each person refusing to contribute towards the benefit of the whole; and if it should happen, that she should perish, through want, in a Jail, they would sooner condemn her folly, than pity her sufferings.’

This did not deter our poetess from voluntarily preferring herself before the Court of King’s Bench, as the author of the Atalantis.

When she was examined before the secretary (then lord Sunderland) he was assiduous to know from whom she had got information of some particulars, which they imagined were above her own intelligence.  Her defence was with much humility and sorrow, at the same time denying that any persons were concerned with her, or that she had a farther design than writing for her own amusement, and diversion in the country, without intending particular reflexions, or characters; when this was not believed, and the contrary urged against her by several circumstances, she said, ’then it must be by inspiration, because knowing her own innocence, she could account for it no other way.’  The secretary replied, ’that inspiration used to be upon a good account, and her writings were stark naught.’  She, with an air of penitence, ’acknowledged, that his lordship’s observation might be true, but that there were evil angels, as well as good, so that nevertheless what she had wrote, might still be by inspiration.’

In consequence of this examination, our authoress was close shut up in a messenger’s house, without being allowed pen, ink, and paper.  However her council sued out her Habeas Corpus at the King’s-Bench Bar, and she was admitted to bail.

Whether those in power were ashamed to bring a woman to her trial, for writing a few amorous trifles, or our laws were defective, as was generally conjectured, because she had disguised her satire under romantic names, and a feigned scene of action, she was discharged, after several times exposing her in person, to cross the court before the Bench of Judges, with her three attendants, the Printer, and two Publishers.

Not long after this a total change of the ministry ensued, the statesmen to whom she had been obnoxious were removed, and consequently all her fears upon that score dissipated; her native gaiety, and good humour returned, and she again employed herself in writing a tragedy for the stage, and resolved never more to deal in politics, as being much out of the natural sphere of a woman, she was persuaded it was folly in one in her station, to disoblige any party by a pen, equally qualified to divert all.  Being advanced to the autumn of her charms, she conversed with the opposite sex, in a manner very delicate,