TABLE I.
RECURRENT ASSOCIATIONS.
================+===========================================
======+ Total Number of | |
Associations. | Occurring in |
|-------------------------------------------------+
| Quadruplets. | Triplets. | Doublets. | Singles.|
505 | 116 | 108 | 114 | 167 |
----------------+--------------+------------+-----------+---
------+ Per cent . 100 | 23 | 21 | 23 | 33 | ================+==============+============+
===========+=========+ Total Number of | |
Different | Occurring |
Associations. +-------------------------------------------------+
| Four times. |Three times.| Twice. | Once. |
----------------+--------------+------------+-----------+---
------+
289 | 29 | 36 | 57 | 167 |
----------------+--------------+------------+-----------+---
------+ Per cent . 100 | 10 | 12 | 20 | 58 | ================+==============+============+
===========+=========+

I was fully prepared to find much iteration in my ideas but had little expected that out of every hundred words twenty-three would give rise to exactly the same association in every one of the four trials; twenty-one to the same association in three out of the four, and so on, the experiments having been purposely conducted under very different conditions of time and local circumstances.  This shows much less variety in the mental stock of ideas than I had expected, and makes us feel that the roadways of our minds are worn into very deep ruts.  I conclude from the proved number of faint and barely conscious thoughts, and from the proved iteration of them, that the mind is perpetually travelling over familiar ways without our memory retaining any impression of its excursions.  Its footsteps are so light and fleeting that it is only by such experiments as I have described that we can learn anything about them.  It is apparently always engaged in mumbling over its old stores, and if any one of these is wholly neglected for a while, it is apt to be forgotten, perhaps irrecoverably.  It is by no means the keenness of interest and of the attention when first observing an object, that fixes it in the recollection.  We pore over the pages of a Bradshaw, and study the trains for some particular journey with the greatest interest; but the event passes by, and the hours and other facts which we once so eagerly considered become absolutely forgotten.  So in games of whist, and in a large number of similar instances.  As I understand it, the subject must have a continued living interest in order to retain an abiding place in the memory.  The mind must refer to it frequently, but whether it does so consciously or unconsciously is not perhaps a matter of much importance.  Otherwise, as a general rule, the recollection sinks, and appears to be utterly drowned in the waters of Lethe.