From the station to this place was four miles; and, as weary and hopeless we were returning to it, it occurred to H. to ask the driver if he knew of any houses to let in the vicinity.  He considered, then said he only knew of one, which had been vacant some time, and that parties who had been to see it would not take it because it was situated in a bad neighborhood.

At the commencement of our search that would have been quite sufficient to have deterred us from looking at it, but we could not now afford to be fastidious.  Our own house was let, and move from it we must in less than a fortnight; so we desired the driver to take us into this bad neighborhood, and were rewarded for the additional distance we travelled by finding an old-fashioned, but very convenient house, with plenty of good-sized rooms in excellent repair, a very pretty flower-garden, with greenhouse, good kitchen-garden of on acre, an orchard of the same extent well stocked with fine fruit-trees, three acres of good meadow-land, an excellent coach-house and stabling, with houses for cows, pigs, and poultry, all in good order.

The “bad neighborhood” was not so very bad.  The cottages just outside the gates were small, new buildings; and once inside, you saw nothing but your own grounds.  It possessed the advantage of being less than two miles from a station, and not more than twelve from London.

“This will do,” we both exclaimed, “if the rent is not too high.”

We had been asked $600 for much inferior places; so that it was with great anxiety we directed our civil driver to take us to the party who had the disposal of the house.  When there, we met with the welcome intelligence, that house, gardens, orchard, meadows, and buildings, were all included in a rental of $370 per annum.  We concluded the bargain there and then, and on that day fortnight took possession of “Our Farm of Four Acres.”

Before we close this chapter, we will address a few words to such of our readers as may entertain the idea that houses in the country may be had “for next to nothing.”  We had repeatedly heard this asserted, and when we resolved to give $300 a year, we thought that we should have no difficulty in meeting with a respectable habitation for that sum, large enough for our family and with the quantity of land we required, as well as within a moderate distance of London.  We have already told the reader how fallacious we found this hope to be.  Houses within forty or fifty miles of London, in what are called “good situations,” are nearly, if not quite as high rented, as those in the suburbs, and land worth quite as much.  If at any time a “cheap place” is to be met with, be quite sure that there is some drawback to compensate for the low price.

In our pilgrimages to empty houses, we frequently found some which were low-rented, that is from $200 $250 per annum; but either they were much smaller than we required, or dreadfully out of repair, or else they were built “Cockney fashion,” semi-detached, or, as was frequently the case, situated in a locality which for some reason or other was highly objectionable.  We always found rents lower in proportion to the distance from a station.