way.  So you have the evils of prostitution substituted for the evils of over-population.  Now, what says Dr. Knowlton?  There being this choice of evils—­there being this unquestioned evil of over-population which exists in a great part of the civilised world—­is the remedy proposed by Malthus so doubtful that probably it would lead to greater evils than the one which it is intended to remedy?  Dr. Knowlton suggests—­and here we come to the critical point of this inquiry—­he suggests that, instead of marriage being postponed, it shall be hastened.  He suggests that marriage shall take place in the hey-day of life, when the passions are at their highest, and that the evils of over-population shall be remedied by persons, after they have married, having recourse to artificial means to prevent the procreation of a numerous offspring, and the consequent evils, especially to the poorer classes, which the production of a too numerous offspring is certain to bring about.  Now, gentlemen, that is the scope of the book.  With a view to make those to whom these remedies are suggested understand, appreciate, and be capable of applying them, he enters into details as to the physiological circumstances connected with the procreation of the species.  The Solicitor-General says—­and that was the first proposition with which he started—­that the whole of this is a delusion and a sham.  When Knowlton says that he wishes that marriage should take place as early as possible—­marriage being the most sacred and holy of all human relations—­he means nothing of the kind, but means and suggests, in the sacred name of marriage, illicit intercourse between the sexes, or a kind of prostitution.  Now, gentlemen, whatever may be your opinion about the propositions contained in this work, when you come to weigh carefully the views of this undoubted physician and would-be philosopher, I think you will agree with me that to say that he meant to depreciate marriage for the sake of prostitution, and that all he says about marriage is only a disguise, and intended to impress upon the mind sentiments of an entirely different character for the gratification of passion, otherwise than by marriage, is a most unjust accusation.  (Applause in court.) I must say that I believe that every word he says about marriage being a desirable institution, and every word he says with reference to the enjoyments and happiness it engenders, is said as honestly and truly as anything probably ever uttered by any man.  I can only believe that when the Solicitor-General made that statement he had not half studied the book.  But I pass that by.  I come to the plain issue before you.  Knowlton goes into physiological details connected with the functions of the generation and procreation of children.  The principles of this pamphlet, with its details, are to be found in greater abundance and distinctness in numerous works to which your attention has been directed, and, having these details before you, you must judge for yourselves whether there is anything in them which is calculated to excite the passions of man and debase the public morals.  If so, every medical work is open to the same imputation.”