For the details of his later life, his conversations, growing weakness, little journeys, unconquerable love of literature, &c., we must refer our readers to Boswell’s teeming narrative.  In 1783, he had a stroke of palsy, which deprived him for a time of speech.  That returned to him, however, but a complication of complaints, including asthma, sciatica, and dropsy, began gradually to undermine his powerful frame.  He continued to the last to cherish the prospect of a tour to Italy, but never accomplished his purpose.  Death had all along been his great object of dread, and its fast approaches were regarded with unmitigated terror.  “Cut deeper,” he cried to the physicians who were operating on his limbs; “cut deeper; I don’t care for pain, but I fear death.”  He fixed all his dying hope upon the Cross, and recommended Clarke’s Sermons as fullest on the doctrine of a Propitiation.  He spoke of the Bible and of the Sabbath with the warmest feelings of belief and respect.  At last, on the 13th day of December 1784, in the seventy-fifth year of his age, this great, good man, whose fears had subsided, and who had become as a little child, fell asleep in Jesus.  He was buried in Westminster Abbey, on Monday, December 20th, and his funeral was attended by the most distinguished men of the day.

Perhaps no literary man ever exerted, during his lifetime, the same personal influence as Samuel Johnson.  Shelley used to call Byron the “Byronic Energy,” from a sense of his exceeding power.  The author of “Rasselas” was the “Johnsonian Energy;” and the demon within him, if not so ethereal and terrible as Byron’s, was far more massive, equally strong, and in conversation, at least, much more ready to do his work.  First-rate conversation generally springs from a desire to shine, or from the effort of a full mind to relieve itself, or from exuberant animal spirits, or from deep-seated misery.  In Johnson it sprang from a combination of all these causes.  He went to conversation as to an arena—­his mind was richly-stored, even to overflowing—­in company his spirits uniformly rose—­and yet there was always at his heart a burden of wretchedness, seeking solace, not in silence, but in speech.  Hence, with the exception of Burke, no one ever matched him in talk; and Burke, we imagine, although profounder in thought, more varied in learning, and more brilliant in imagination, seldom fairly pitted himself against Johnson.  He was a younger man, and held the sage in too much reverence to encounter him often with any deliberate and determined purpose of contest.  He frequently touched the shield of the general challenger, not with the sharp, but with the butt-end of his lance.  He said, on one occasion, when asked why he had not talked more in Johnson’s company, “Oh! it is enough for me to have rung the bell to him!”