by the support of the patricians, by his own merit,
and by reason of his three sons, not one of whom was
inferior to Caeso in greatness of spirit, while they
were his superiors in the exercise of prudence and
moderation, whenever occasion required. When
he entered upon office, in his frequent harangues
from the tribunal, he was not more vehement in restraining
the commons than in reproving the senate, owing to
the listlessness of which body the tribunes of the
commons, now become a standing institution, exercised
regal authority, by means of their readiness of speech
and prosecutions, not as if in a republic of the Roman
people, but as if in an ill-regulated household.
That with his son Caeso, valour, constancy, all the
splendid qualifications of youth in war and in peace,
had been driven and exiled from the city of Rome:
that talkative and turbulent men, sowers of discord,
twice and even thrice re-elected tribunes by the vilest
intrigues, lived in the enjoyment of regal irresponsibility.
“Does that Aulus Verginius,” said he,
“deserve less punishment than Appius Herdonius,
because he was not in the Capitol? Considerably
more, by Hercules, if any one will look at the matter
fairly. Herdonius, if nothing else, by avowing
himself an enemy, thereby as good as gave you notice
to take up arms: this man, by denying the existence
of war, took arms out of your hands, and exposed you
defenceless to the attack of slaves and exiles.
And did you—I will speak with all due respect
for Gaius Claudius and Publius Valerius, now no more—did
you decide to advance against the Capitoline Hill
before you expelled those enemies from the forum?
I feel ashamed in the sight of gods and men.
When the enemy were in the citadel, in the Capitol,
when the leader of the exiles and slaves, after profaning
everything, took up his residence in the shrine of
Jupiter, best and greatest, arms were taken up at Tusculum
sooner than at Rome. It was a matter of doubt
whether Lucius Mamilius, the Tusculan leader, or Publius
Valerius and Gaius Claudius, the consuls, recovered
the Roman citadel, and we, who formerly did not suffer
the Latins to touch arms, not even in their own defence,
when they had the enemy on their very frontiers, should
have been taken and destroyed now, had not the Latins
taken up arms of their own accord. Tribunes,
is this bringing aid to the commons, to expose them
in a defenceless state to be butchered by the enemy?
I suppose, if any one, even the humblest individual
of your commons—which portion you have as
it were broken off from the rest of the state, and
created a country and a commonwealth of your own—if
any one of these were to bring you word that his house
was beset by an armed band of slaves, you would think
that assistance should be afforded him: was then
Jupiter, best and greatest, when hemmed in by the
arms of exiles and of slaves, deserving of no human
aid? And do these persons claim to be considered
sacred and inviolable, to whom the gods themselves


