2086. Joh. 5.
2087. Epist. lib. 2. Jam suffectus in locum
demortui, protinus exortus est
adversarius, &c.
post multos labores, sumptus, &c.
2088. Jun. Acad. cap. 6.
2089. Accipiamus pecuniam, demittamus asinum ut apud Patavinos, Italos.
2090. Hos non ita pridem perstrinxi, in Philosophastro
Commaedia latina, in
Aede Christi Oxon,
publice habita, Anno 1617. Feb. 16.
2091. Sat. Menip.
2092. 2 Cor. vii. 17.
2093. Comment. in Gal.
2094. Heinsius.
2095. Ecclesiast.
2096. Luth. in Gal.
2097. Pers. Sat. 2.
2098. Sallust.
2099. Sat. Menip.
2100. Budaeus de Asse, lib. 5.
2101. Lib. de rep. Gallorum.
2102. Campian.
2103. As for ourselves (for neither are we free
from this fault) the same
guilt, the same
crime, may be objected against us: for it is through
our fault, negligence,
and avarice, that so many and such shameful
corruptions occur
in the church (both the temple and the Deity are
offered for sale),
that such sordidness is introduced, such impiety
committed, such
wickedness, such a mad gulf of wretchedness and
irregularity—these
I say arise from all our faults, but more
particularly from
ours of the University. We are the nursery in
which
those ills are
bred with which the state is afflicted; we voluntarily
introduce them,
and are deserving of every opprobrium and suffering,
since we do not
afterwards encounter them according to our strength.
For what better
can we expect when so many poor, beggarly fellows,
men of every order,
are readily and without election, admitted to
degrees?
Who, if they can only commit to memory a few definitions
and
divisions, and
pass the customary period in the study of logics, no
matter with what
effect, whatever sort they prove to be, idiots,
triflers, idlers,
gamblers, sots, sensualists,
——“mere ciphers in the book of life Like those who boldly woo’d Ulysses’ wife; Born to consume the fruits of earth: in truth, As vain and idle as Pheacia’s youth;”
only let them have passed the stipulated period in the University, and professed themselves collegians: either for the sake of profit, or through the influence of their friends, they obtain a presentation; nay, sometimes even accompanied by brilliant eulogies upon their morals and acquirements; and when they are about to take leave, they are honoured with the most flattering literary testimonials in their favour, by those who undoubtedly sustain a loss of reputation in granting them. For doctors and professors (as an author says) are anxious about one thing only, viz., that out of their various callings they may promote their


