by the Attorney-General is the requiring security to the amount of 500L. from two sureties that the editor shall pay fines on account of libels.  This is reasonable, and would to some extent prevent the putting up, as is now done, men or women of straw as editors, who have no means of paying fines.  The other proposal of the Attorney-General, that the types should be seizable to whomever they may belong, is objectionable and would hardly be carried.  Peel is very sorry the question is stirred at the present moment.  The press is generally with us or quiescent, and the ‘Morning Journal,’ [Footnote:  It had been obliged to pay heavy damages for a libel on the Duke of Wellington.] a paper instituted to oppose the Government, has within these few days been given up altogether from the want of support.  Certainly this is not the moment at which it is desirable to appear to commence an attack upon the Press—­and the Attorney-General can do nothing that will not be suspected by them.

The Duke has written a memorandum on the Hyderabad affair.

May 16.

Read the Duke’s memorandum; he mistakes the law.  However, I cannot write notes upon his memorandum without the Act of Parliament.  The King had an indifferent night, but still feels better.  I only met Lord Bathurst, who told me so.  He had not seen the private letter.

Had a long conversation with Lady C. Wood at Lord Camden’s about the Clarences.  It seems there has been a great deal of hope excited in the Spencers.

They expect Lord Holland to be made Minister, and their son Bob or Lord Darnley to be first Lord of the Admiralty!—­Nous verrons.

It seems the Duchess of Clarence and the Duchess of Kent were and are great friends, and the Duchess of Clarence is very fond of the young Princess.

Monday, May 17.

At eleven set off with Lord Rosslyn for Windsor.  We drove to the visitor’s entrance.  After a time Sir A. Barnard came.  Lord Rosslyn said we did not presume to ask to see the King, but we were anxious to know how His Majesty was, and to present our humble duty to him.

Sir A. asked if we would see Knighton?  Lord Rosslyn said it would be very satisfactory.  However, no Knighton came, but a message through Sir A. Barnard that Sir Wm. Knighton had gone in to the King and had mentioned we were there, and His Majesty had expressed himself very sensible of our kind attention.  This I conclude is Knighton’s own message, and that the King will never hear we have been.  Sir A. Barnard seemed in excellent spirits about the King.  He had a good night, and is certainly much better.  He talks of being able to go to Ascot and to stand up in the carriage, though he could not go up into the stand.

We met the Bishop of Chichester going back to town.  I suppose he thinks he shall not be wanted.

Rode down to the House.  East Retford.

The Duke’s private account of the King is excellent.