Your question is reasonable; but I am anxious how I
shall speak to him. Cannot you then speak to him
as you choose? But I fear that I may be disconcerted?
If you are going to write the name of Dion, are you
afraid that you would be disconcerted? By no means.
Why? is it not because you have practised writing
the name? Certainly. Well, if you were going
to read the name, would you not feel the same? and
why? Because every art has a certain strength
and confidence in the things which belong to it.
Have you then not practised speaking? and what else
did you learn in the school? Syllogisms and sophistical
propositions? For what purpose? was it not for
the purpose of discoursing skilfully? and is not discoursing
skilfully the same as discoursing seasonably and cautiously
and with intelligence, and also without making mistakes
and without hindrance, and besides all this with confidence?
Yes. When then you are mounted on a horse and
go into a plain, are you anxious at being matched
against a man who is on foot, and anxious in a matter
in which you are practised, and he is not? Yes,
but that person (to whom I am going to speak) has power
to kill me. Speak the truth, then, unhappy man,
and do not brag, nor claim to be a philosopher, nor
refuse to acknowledge your masters, but so long as
you present this handle in your body, follow every
man who is stronger than yourself. Socrates used
to practice speaking, he who talked as he did to the
tyrants, to the dicasts (judges), he who talked in
his prison. Diogenes had practised speaking,
he who spoke as he did to Alexander, to the pirates,
to the person who bought him. These men were confident
in the things which they practised. But do you
walk off to your own affairs and never leave them:
go and sit in a corner, and weave syllogisms, and
propose them to another. There is not in you the
man who can rule a state.
* * * *
*
To Naso.—When a certain Roman
entered with his son and listened to one reading,
Epictetus said, This is the method of instruction;
and he stopped. When the Roman asked him to go
on, Epictetus said, Every art when it is taught causes
labor to him who is unacquainted with it and is unskilled
in it, and indeed the things which proceed from the
arts immediately show their use in the purpose for
which they were made; and most of them contain something
attractive and pleasing. For indeed to be present
and to observe how a shoemaker learns is not a pleasant
thing; but the shoe is useful and also not disagreeable
to look at. And the discipline of a smith when
he is learning is very disagreeable to one who chances
to be present and is a stranger to the art: but
the work shows the use of the art. But you will
see this much more in music; for if you are present
while a person is learning, the discipline will appear
most disagreeable; and yet the results of music are
pleasing and delightful to those who know nothing
of music. And here we conceive the work of a