Those who spoke of the promise as being made earlier,
when William and Edward were boys together in Normandy,
forgot that Edward was many years older than William.
The only possible moment earlier than the visit was
when Edward was elected king in 1042. Before
that time he could hardly have thought of disposing
of a kingdom which was not his, and at that time he
might have looked forward to leaving sons to succeed
him. Still less could the promise have been
made later than the visit. From 1053 to the end
of his life Edward was under English influences, which
led him first to send for his nephew Edward from Hungary
as his successor, and in the end to make a recommendation
in favour of Harold. But in 1051-52 Edward,
whether under a vow or not, may well have given up
the hope of children; he was surrounded by Norman
influences; and, for the only time in the last twenty-four
years of their joint lives, he and William met face
to face. The only difficulty is one to which
no contemporary writer makes any reference. If
Edward wished to dispose of his crown in favour of
one of his French-speaking kinsmen, he had a nearer
kinsman of whom he might more naturally have thought.
His own nephew Ralph was living in England and holding
an English earldom. He had the advantage over
both William and his own older brother Walter of Mantes,
in not being a reigning prince elsewhere. We
can only say that there is evidence that Edward did
think of William, that there is no evidence that he
ever thought of Ralph. And, except the tie of
nearer kindred, everything would suggest William rather
than Ralph. The personal comparison is almost
grotesque; and Edward’s early associations and
the strongest influences around him, were not vaguely
French but specially Norman. Archbishop Robert
would plead for his own native sovereign only.
In short, we may be as nearly sure as we can be of
any fact for which there is no direct authority, that
Edward’s promise to William was made at the
time of William’s visit to England, and that
William’s homage to Edward was done in the character
of a destined successor to the English crown.
William then came to England a mere duke and went
back to Normandy a king expectant. But the value
of his hopes, to the value of the promise made to
him, are quite another matter. Most likely they
were rated on both sides far above their real value.
King and duke may both have believed that they were
making a settlement which the English nation was bound
to respect. If so, Edward at least was undeceived
within a few months.
The notion of a king disposing of his crown by his
own act belongs to the same range of ideas as the
law of strict hereditary succession. It implies
that kingship is a possession and not an office.
Neither the heathen nor the Christian English had
ever admitted that doctrine; but it was fast growing
on the continent. Our forefathers had always
combined respect for the kingly house with some measure