the sentiment was pronounced, “Millions for defence, but not a cent for tribute.”  This sentiment has often been ascribed to Pinckney, who is supposed to have uttered it when approached by the unofficial agents in Paris.  The correspondence shows, however, that the words employed by Mr. Pinckney were, “No, no; not a sixpence!” The meaning was similar, but the phrase employed at Philadelphia is entitled to a certain immortality of its own.

On his return to the United States, Marshall resumed the practice of his profession; but soon afterwards, at the earnest entreaty of Washington, he became a candidate for Congress, declining for that purpose an appointment to the Supreme Court of the United States, as successor to Mr. Justice Wilson.  He was elected after an exciting canvass, and in December, 1799, took his seat.  He immediately assumed a leading place among the supporters of President Adams’s administration, though on one occasion he exhibited his independence of mere party discipline by voting to repeal the obnoxious second section of the Sedition Law.  But of all the acts by which his course in Congress was distinguished, the most important was his defence of the administration, in the case of Jonathan Robbins, alias Thomas Nash, By the twenty-seventh article of the Jay treaty it was provided that fugitives from justice should be delivered up for the offence of murder or forgery.  Under this stipulation Robbins, alias Nash, was charged with the commission of the crime of murder on board a British privateer on the high seas.  He was arrested on a warrant issued upon the affidavit of the British Consul at Charleston, South Carolina.  After his arrest an application was made to Judge Bee, sitting in the United States Circuit Court at Charleston, for a writ of habeas corpus.  While Robbins was in custody, the President, John Adams, addressed a note to Judge Bee, requesting and advising him, if it should appear that the evidence warranted it, to deliver the prisoner up to the representatives of the British government.  The examination was held by Judge Bee, and Robbins was duly surrendered.  It is an illustration of the vicissitudes of politics that, on the strength of this incident, the cry was raised that the President had caused the delivery up of an American citizen who had previously been impressed into the British service.  For this charge there was no ground whatever; but it was made to serve the purposes of the day, and was one of the causes of the popular antagonism to the administration of John Adams.  When Congress met in December, 1799, a resolution was offered by Mr. Livingston, of New York, severely condemning the course of the administration.  Its action was defended in the House of Representatives by Marshall on two grounds:  first, that the case was one clearly within the provisions of the treaty; and, second, that no act having been passed by Congress for the execution of the treaty, it was incumbent