I have uniformly considered our committee for the abolition of the Slave Trade; as we usually consider the human body, that is, as made up of a head and of various members which had different offices to perform.  Thus, if one man was an eye, another was an ear, another an arm, and another a foot.  And here I may say, with great truth, that I believe no committee was ever made up of persons, whose varied talents were better adapted to the work before them.  Viewing then the committee in this light, and myself as in connexion with it, I may deduce those truths, with which the analogy will furnish me.  And first, it will follow, that if every member has performed his office faithfully, though one may have done something more than another, yet no one of them in particular has any reason to boast.  With what propriety could the foot, though in the execution of its duty it had become weary, say to the finger, “Thou hast done less than I;” when the finger could reply with truth, “I have done all that has been given me to do?”.  It will follow, also, that as every limb is essentially necessary for the completion of a perfect work; so in the case before us, every one was as necessary in his own office, or department, as another.  For what, for example, could I myself have done if I had not derived so much assistance from the committee?  What could Mr. Wilberforce have done in Parliament, if I, on the other hand, had not collected that great body of evidence, to which there was such a constant appeal?  And what could the committee have done without the parliamentary aid of Mr. Wilberforce?  And in mentioning this necessity of distinct offices and talents for the accomplishment of the great work, in which we have been all of us engaged, I feel myself bound by the feelings of justice to deliver it as my opinion in this place, (for, perhaps, I may have no other opportunity,) that knowing, as I have done, so many members of both houses of our legislature, for many of whom I have had a sincere respect, there was never yet one, who appeared to me to be so properly qualified, in all respects, for the management of the great cause of the abolition of the Slave Trade, as he, whose name I have just mentioned.  His connexions, but more particularly his acquaintance with the first minister of state, were of more service in the promotion of it, than they, who are but little acquainted with political movements, can well appreciate.  His habits also of diligent and persevering inquiry made him master of all the knowledge that was requisite for conducting it.  His talents both in and out of parliament made him a powerful advocate in its favour.  His character, free from the usual spots of human imperfection, gave an appropriate lustre to the cause, making it look yet more lovely, and enticing others to its support.  But most of all the motive, on which he undertook it, insured its progress.  For this did not originate in views of selfishness, or of party or of popular applause, but in an awful