A Bend in the River | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 25 pages of analysis & critique of A Bend in the River.

A Bend in the River | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 25 pages of analysis & critique of A Bend in the River.
This section contains 6,823 words
(approx. 23 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Ranu Samantrai

SOURCE: Samantrai, Ranu. “Claiming the Burden: Naipaul's Africa.” Research in African Literatures 31, no. 1 (spring 2000): 50-62.

In the following essay, Samantrai examines the function of imperialistic discourse in A Bend in the River and describes the novel as “a fictional documentation of the political shift from colonial to postcolonial Africa.”

In his work on the epistemology of the anthropological endeavor, Johannes Fabian argues that the “West” constructs its relationship with “the Rest” (28) through a notion of time that affirms “difference as distance” (16). Fabian is concerned primarily with the notion of modernity, the trope through which the West locates itself and constructs the difference of its racial and cultural others. Inherent in his “Politics of Time,” however, is a politics of sexuality that, in addition to creating a teleological history for the triumph of the normative Western subject, also posits a specifically gendered location for the Rest. The epistemology Fabian...

(read more)

This section contains 6,823 words
(approx. 23 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Ranu Samantrai
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Essay by Ranu Samantrai from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.