Thomas King | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 30 pages of analysis & critique of Thomas King.

Thomas King | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 30 pages of analysis & critique of Thomas King.
This section contains 8,423 words
(approx. 29 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Sharon M. Bailey

SOURCE: Bailey, Sharon M. “The Arbitrary Nature of the Story: Poking Fun at Oral and Written Authority in Thomas King's Green Grass, Running Water.World Literature Today 73, no. 1 (winter 1999): 43-52.

In the following essay, Bailey analyzes how King approaches the subject of oral and written authority in Green Grass, Running Water.

To speak of post-structuralist theory in conjunction with Native American literatures may seem as odd as serving dog stew with sauce béarnaise.

—Arnold Krupat, “Post-Structuralism and Oral Literature”

In Green Grass, Running Water a narrator and the trickster Coyote preside over two loosely interwoven plots: one based on the myth of the creation of the world, and one based on the quasi-realistic events on and near a Canadian Blackfoot reservation. In the myth plot the creation story is retold four times, once each by four different Indian women: First Woman, Changing Woman, Thought Woman, and Old...

(read more)

This section contains 8,423 words
(approx. 29 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Sharon M. Bailey
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Essay by Sharon M. Bailey from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.