Jurassic Park (film) | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 3 pages of analysis & critique of Jurassic Park (film).

Jurassic Park (film) | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 3 pages of analysis & critique of Jurassic Park (film).
This section contains 706 words
(approx. 3 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Review by Mark Amory

SOURCE: Amory, Mark. “Bronto Buster.” Spectator 271, no. 8610 (17 July 1993): 37-8.

In the following review, Amory provides a mixed assessment of Jurassic Park, concluding that the movie is predictable and exhibits a lack of energy and imagination.

You haven't read the book, you never wore the tee-shirt, you missed the comic, the ice-cream special and the not-so-cuddly toys, now you can skip the movie. Jurassic Park was designed to make money, it has taken more in one day than any film has ever done before and is heading for the world record, so it is perfect. Also it is on purpose: Spielberg has achieved the film he wanted. Criticism will be about as effective at stopping the advance of this monster as arrows bouncing off a triceratops.

Still, for the record, the structure is odd. Part of Spielberg's great talent is that in his adventure films he gets the tone...

(read more)

This section contains 706 words
(approx. 3 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Review by Mark Amory
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Review by Mark Amory from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.