Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 3 pages of analysis & critique of Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom.

Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 3 pages of analysis & critique of Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom.
This section contains 705 words
(approx. 3 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Review by Tom O'Brien

SOURCE: O'Brien, Tom. “Parsifal at the Bat.” Commonweal 111, no. 12 (15 June 1984): 373-74.

In the following review, O'Brien describes the action sequences in Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom as “relentless” and “predictable.”

The priests of Kali (remember Gunga Din?) are at it again; tearing hearts out, performing human sacrifice, renewing the ancient conspiracy of the original “thugs,” and chanting mantras on their route to worldwide domination. They have stolen this sacred diamond from a poor Himalayan village (grabbing its children to boot), and ace archeologist Indiana Jones (having just narrowly escaped the clutches of a sadistic Shanghai gangster), must penetrate their secret palace, recover the diamond, rescue the kidnapped children, and destroy this focus of evil in the early twentieth-century world. If it wasn't for the services of his faithful “Indian” companion (here a Chinese boy, but you get the idea), Indiana might not make it, especially considering...

(read more)

This section contains 705 words
(approx. 3 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Review by Tom O'Brien
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Review by Tom O'Brien from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.