Eyes Wide Shut | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 18 pages of analysis & critique of Eyes Wide Shut.

Eyes Wide Shut | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 18 pages of analysis & critique of Eyes Wide Shut.
This section contains 5,108 words
(approx. 18 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Review by Lee Siegel

SOURCE: “Eyes Wide Shut: What the Critics Failed to See in Kubrick's Last Film,” in Harper's Magazine, Vol. 299, October, 1999, pp. 76-82.

In the following positive assessment of Eyes Wide Shut, Siegel denounces the overwhelming negative reaction to Kubrick's final film, maintaining that “our official arbiters of culture have lost the gift of being able to comprehend a work of art that does not reflect their immediate experience; they have become afraid of genuine art.”

Eyes Wide Shut is one of the most moving, playful, and complex movies I have ever seen. I love the way Stanley Kubrick expresses the film's theme of social and psychological doubleness through a double entendre in the film's very title—“I's Wide Shut”—and through his choice, for the title song, of a waltz by Dmitry Shostakovich, a guileful composer famous for writing music whose subtle motifs seemed to celebrate Stalin but actually...

(read more)

This section contains 5,108 words
(approx. 18 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Review by Lee Siegel
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Review by Lee Siegel from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.