Anselm of Canterbury | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 20 pages of analysis & critique of Anselm of Canterbury.

Anselm of Canterbury | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 20 pages of analysis & critique of Anselm of Canterbury.
This section contains 5,591 words
(approx. 19 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by J. F. Worthen

SOURCE: Worthen, J. F. “Augustine's De trinitate and Anselm's Proslogion: ‘Exercere Lectorum.'” In Collectanea Augustiniana, edited by Joseph T. Lienhard, Earl C. Muller, and Roland J. Teske, pp. 517-29. New York: Peter Lang, 1993.

In the following essay, Worthen asserts that St. Augustine in his De trinitate and Anselm in his Proslogion engage in a narrative process of leading readers toward an understanding of God, and compares the methods used by both writers to achieve this goal.

I

The power of speech, Socrates says in the Phaedrus, consists in ψυχαγωγία, which we might translate as “the leading of souls.”1 Plato as an author is interested in discourse not as a neutral medium for the communication of information but as a way of leading—of shaping, transforming—the souls of his readers. Augustine and Anselm are similarly concerned to create texts that will not only transfer knowledge but engage their...

(read more)

This section contains 5,591 words
(approx. 19 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by J. F. Worthen
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Essay by J. F. Worthen from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.