What the butler saw | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 14 pages of analysis & critique of What the butler saw.

What the butler saw | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 14 pages of analysis & critique of What the butler saw.
This section contains 3,966 words
(approx. 14 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Maurice Charney

SOURCE: "What Did the Butler See in Orton's 'What the Butler Saw?," in Modern Drama, Vol. XXV, No. 4, December, 1982, pp. 496-504.

In the following essay, Charney focuses on Joe Orton 's play What the Butler Saw as a black-comedy farce concerned with sexual identity and lurid sexual behavior.

What the Butler Saw by Joe Orton (written in 1967 and produced posthumously in 1969) is, of course, a farce without a butler, which should more properly have been called What the Butler Might Have Seen had there been a butler and had he been privileged to oversee the strange goings-on in Dr. Prentice's private clinic. Like Stoppard in The Real Inspector Hound, Orton is parodying the whodunit conventions without actually writing a mystery story. We need the invisible butler in What the Butler Saw as a stand-in for the cozy and complacent amenities of upper-middle-class drawing-room life. Dr. Prentice's establishment is...

(read more)

This section contains 3,966 words
(approx. 14 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Maurice Charney
Copyrights
Gale
Maurice Charney from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.