The Anatomy of Melancholy | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 26 pages of analysis & critique of The Anatomy of Melancholy.

The Anatomy of Melancholy | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 26 pages of analysis & critique of The Anatomy of Melancholy.
This section contains 7,073 words
(approx. 24 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Judith Kegan Gardiner

SOURCE: Gardiner, Judith Kegan. “Elizabethan Psychology and Burton's Anatomy of Melancholy.Journal of the History of Ideas 38, No. 3 (July-September 1977): 373-88.

In the essay below, Gardiner explores the dimensions of Burton's psychological method in The Anatomy of Melancholy, concluding that “Burton digests his medieval and Renaissance science and other material available to him to create a humanistic psychology that is both comprehensive and reasonably coherent.”

In 1946 Louise C. Turner Forest wrote “A Caveat …” to warn against the dangers of applying Elizabethan psychology to literary characters. The psychological tracts of the English Renaissance were “a chaotic jumble of ambiguous or contradictory fact and theory,” often more physiological than psychological. Forest concluded that Elizabethan psychology did not exist as a coherent body of belief. Contemporary dramatists could choose illustrations at will from bits and pieces of outmoded medieval scientific “facts” or from “vague general notions” or personal observations.1 Like the bumblebee...

(read more)

This section contains 7,073 words
(approx. 24 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Judith Kegan Gardiner
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Essay by Judith Kegan Gardiner from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.