Gladiator (2000 film) | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 5 pages of analysis & critique of Gladiator (2000 film).

Gladiator (2000 film) | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 5 pages of analysis & critique of Gladiator (2000 film).
This section contains 1,172 words
(approx. 4 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Review by Leslie Felperin

SOURCE: Felperin, Leslie. “Decline and Brawl.” Sight and Sound 10, no. 6 (June 2000): 34-5.

In the following review, Felperin asserts that Gladiator is Scott's best work to date, observing that the film functions as an allegory that expresses an implicit criticism of the contemporary American mass entertainment culture.

The Encyclopaedia Britannica imperiously dismisses the Roman philosopher-emperor Marcus Aurelius as “a historically overrated figure, presiding in a bewildered way over an empire beneath the gilt of which there already lay many a decaying patch.” In Ridley Scott's magnificent new action film Gladiator the patch has become a serious infestation of dry rot that no amount of gilt, indigo or porphyry can disguise. The damage is carved on the performers themselves, many of whom seem to have been cast for their interesting facial scars as much as for their acting ability. As we watch the story—of Maximus (Russell Crowe), a Roman...

(read more)

This section contains 1,172 words
(approx. 4 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Review by Leslie Felperin
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Review by Leslie Felperin from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.