Much Ado About Nothing | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 5 pages of analysis & critique of Much Ado About Nothing.

Much Ado About Nothing | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 5 pages of analysis & critique of Much Ado About Nothing.
This section contains 1,381 words
(approx. 5 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Review by Russell Jackson

SOURCE: Jackson, Russell. Review of Much Ado about Nothing. Shakespeare Quarterly 54, no. 2 (summer 2003): 167-95.

In the following excerpted review of the 2002/2003 Royal Shakespeare Company season at Stratford-upon-Avon, Jackson summarizes the major dramatic movements and principal character interpretations that made up Gregory Doran's generally well-received staging of Much Ado about Nothing.

The first two plays in the Stratford season were cross-cast in the supporting roles but did not share the same principals: Harriet Walter (Beatrice) and Nicholas Le Prevost (Benedick) appeared only in Much Ado About Nothing, and Stuart Wilson and Sinead Cusack played only Antony and Cleopatra. Of the two productions, Doran's Much Ado was the more successful, A permanent (and very solid-looking) set showed the exterior of Leonato's villa stretching diagonally across and up the stage from the left-hand corner. The large porch, with a balcony reached by a flight of steps, dominated the center of the...

(read more)

This section contains 1,381 words
(approx. 5 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Review by Russell Jackson
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Review by Russell Jackson from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.