Mary Augusta Ward | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 35 pages of analysis & critique of Mary Augusta Ward.

Mary Augusta Ward | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 35 pages of analysis & critique of Mary Augusta Ward.
This section contains 10,242 words
(approx. 35 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by J. E. Sait (essay Date 1988)

[In the following excerpt, Sait discusses Ward's works of the First World War era.]

Undoubtedly the Great War was recognised as the Great Subject by commercially minded writers of fiction and non-fiction. However, few writers achieved any major work in the battlefield and much of the non-combatant literature which did appear has suffered from critical neglect. Neither of the two major critical studies of literature in the Great War, Bernard Bergonzi's Heroes' Twilight: A Study of the Literature of the Great War and Paul Fussell's The Great War and Modern Memory refers to Mrs. Humphry Ward. This neglect is justified to a certain extent in that both male writers are concerned only with male writers. However, their concern with the literature which emanated from the battlefields reaches some generalisations which reflect on Mrs. Ward's own work. Bergonzi asserts: 'The dominant movement in the literature of the Great War...

(read more)

This section contains 10,242 words
(approx. 35 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by J. E. Sait (essay Date 1988)
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Essay by J. E. Sait (essay Date 1988) from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.