George Herbert Mead | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 41 pages of analysis & critique of George Herbert Mead.

George Herbert Mead | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 41 pages of analysis & critique of George Herbert Mead.
This section contains 12,158 words
(approx. 41 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Paul Tibbetts

SOURCE: "Mead's Theory of the Act and Perception: Some Empirical Confirmations," in The Personalist, Vol. LV, No. 2, Spring, 1974, pp. 115-38.

In the following essay, Tibbetts explores Mead's theory of the act and suggests how it can be used to interpret recent findings in experimental psychology.

Introduction

To students of recent American philosophy George Herbert Mead presents a paradox, for whereas Dewey and Whitehead recognized Mead as perhaps this country's most profound and original thinker, his writings largely continue to be ignored by most philosophers today. Though substantial work has been done on Mead's place in the history of ideas1-5, his social psychology6-9, and his theory of knowledge10-13, little has appeared on his theory of the act14-17. This is highly unfortunate since this was Mead's most distinctive and suggestive contribution to philosophy. Certainly no attempts have been made to my knowledge to relate Mead's theory...

(read more)

This section contains 12,158 words
(approx. 41 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Paul Tibbetts
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Essay by Paul Tibbetts from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.